[quote name=\'FOXSportsFan\' post=\'122279\' date=\'Jun 23 2006, 01:22 PM\']
[quote name=\'chris319\' post=\'122245\' date=\'Jun 23 2006, 10:05 AM\']
The notion that the show cannot succeed without Barker is hogwash.
[/quote]
Everything you said before that I'm with, except for this. I think we should identify what is defined by the word "succeed". If you mean have a long, healthy run (say 10+ years) on television post-Barker, I don't necessarily believe so. People are going to equate this show with Bob for some time (as well they should), and odds are when someone new comes along the look and feel of the show will greatly modernize. Gradual change has worked for the show...complete overhaul (think Mr. Davidson's version) not so much.
[/quote]
No, I can't prove it, but you're absolutely wrong on this. This is a cash cow that will likely remain on the CBS schedule until CBS feels that it's local affiliates can completely run daytime better than them. Replacing Bob with an unknown entity will only save CBS millions in production costs. And if someone pulls a Rolf, they'll replace em and do it again, until they get it (not right, but rather) cost efficient.
The same can be said for Pat, Vanna, Alex, Regis, Kellly, Jeff Probst, Howie, and everyone else who tries to wrangle big money as the 'star' of a show. The days of 'host' being the most important entity on a game show are long over. The shows may not be going anywhere, but the hosts will.