[quote name=\'Matt Ottinger\' post=\'127425\' date=\'Aug 14 2006, 08:17 PM\']
In general, if you like a game, lumping it together with its revivals and remakes and, yes, celebrity versions is only going to help your cause. If you feel that a show was diminished by such moves, you should adjust your personal list accodingly.
[/quote]
Here's how I handled that issue: I took whichever version was the best, or "classic" version, and based the ranking on that. I felt it would be unfair to penalize it if a later version was poorly executed or if the 2nd version was an innovative improvement over the first.
Using a fictional example, let's say Whistle or Lose It ran on ABC 1958-61 with Peter Leyden as host, but only a couple of episodes remain. One is available at Shokus and I bought it but it was okay. Then it was revived in syndication 1973-79 as The All New Whistle or Lose It with Tom Kennedy as host, and that's the version everyone loves and remembers. It was rerun on GSN for years and years and built a new generation of fans. A third version, with the trendier-sounding title Whiss, lasted 30 episodes on VH-1 despite dramatic lighting and a lot of attitude. It was an unmitigated bomb that even host Dylan Lane won't put on his resume. But if I put the 1970s version on my list as #4, I'm judging it by its classic, 1970s format, not penalizing it because the Leyden version wasn't inventive enough and the 2003 version was executed poorly.
But that's just me.