#1-It is being very ill-informed if one person decides to take an innocuous comment with a smiley about not wanting to see the last Password reaired because he makes the assumption that somehow it's for a sinister reason. Then of course, there's the simple idiocy of going for the negative assumption in the first place to make a cheap shot as he did.
#2-I referred to him as Mr. Whiny, only because he said, which you so conveniently neglected to quote, that I wasn't worth making amends to because of what I said on ATGS five years ago about a couple of people I think are anti-Catholic bigots that he said was the sum total of what I did there. The fact that this was a false characterization of what I did on ATGS, evidently mattered not a whit either in your eyes it would seem. He was the one whining at Matt for taking him to task, and then decided to unload on me once again after I had made a posting in which I wasn't commenting on his behavior any longer.
#3-You then go back to the "obnoxious jerk" comment from my first justifiably angry reaction after he was the one who unloaded on me for a phony reason as it turned out, so I don't need to defend that one. I was justifiably upset by what he did, and I'm not about to apologize for being angry in that instance.
In short, your characterization of how this exchange then unfolded is dishonest. And there is nothing more dishonest than your trying to state that he never took a cheap shot at me. And that sir, is my opinion, and one I'm sticking to with no regrets. It that troubles you, Mr. Sanctimony with the pornographic metaphor for a signature, well then tough.