Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: GSF 50 Greatest List - RESULTS THREAD  (Read 117229 times)

Chuck Sutton

  • Member
  • Posts: 467
GSF 50 Greatest List - RESULTS THREAD
« Reply #315 on: September 10, 2006, 09:54:49 PM »
[quote name=\'Matt Ottinger\' post=\'130878\' date=\'Sep 9 2006, 11:53 PM\']
[
[color=\"#009900\"]7 Wheel of Fortune (1975-present)[/color]
(3086 77/80)(1 first place vote)(GSN: 6)(TVG: 25)

Aside from a couple of modern shows, the only one on the list that's never been out of production since its premiere.  Woolery left, though.
[/quote]

I will never forget the Greed with the question "which show did Chuck Woolery NOT host?"  Both the contestant and captain said "I know for a fact he did not host Wheel of Fortune"

Dbacksfan12

  • Member
  • Posts: 6202
  • Just leave the set; that’d be terrific.
GSF 50 Greatest List - RESULTS THREAD
« Reply #316 on: September 10, 2006, 09:59:21 PM »
[quote name=\'Chuck Sutton\' post=\'130950\' date=\'Sep 10 2006, 08:49 PM\']
[quote name=\'clemon79\' post=\'130921\' date=\'Sep 10 2006, 02:00 PM\']
Then, I am curious to know why you said this. You know, the part about saying "there is no way it should replace one of the 13 left". Seems awfully contradictory to me.
[/quote]

Because I could put it at #1 and still list all of those 13, like I did.  It did not replace a single one. It was easy; when you don't put Freakin' Studs on the list.
[/quote]
That makes no sense whatsoever.  
/sick of seeing "Freakin' Studs" get overused.
--Mark
Phil 4:13

Chuck Sutton

  • Member
  • Posts: 467
GSF 50 Greatest List - RESULTS THREAD
« Reply #317 on: September 10, 2006, 10:11:36 PM »
Webster's new world dictionary

Replace:  "to take of the place of"

It did not take the place of any of them they were all there.

Matt Ottinger

  • Member
  • Posts: 12987
GSF 50 Greatest List - RESULTS THREAD
« Reply #318 on: September 10, 2006, 10:15:26 PM »
[color=\"#009900\"]5 The Match Game (1962-69, 1973-82, 1990-91)[/color]
(3311 79/80)(6 first place votes)(GSN: 1)(TVG: 10)

[color=\"#009900\"]4 Password (1961-67, 1971-75, 1979-82, 1984-89)[/color]
(3431 78/80)(5 first place votes)(GSN: 15)(TVG: 4)

[color=\"#009900\"]3 The Pyramid (1973-80, 1981, 1982-88, 1991-92, 2002-04)[/color]
(3493 79/80)(11 first place votes)(GSN: 8)(TVG: 6)

[color=\"#009900\"]2 Jeopardy! (1964-75, 1978-79, 1984-present)[/color]
(3494 79/80)(13 first place votes)(GSN: 2)(TVG: 2)

[color=\"#009900\"]1 The Price Is Right (1956-65, 1972-present)[/color]
(3659 78/80)(22 first place votes)(GSN: 4)(TVG: 1)
This has been another installment of Matt Ottinger's Masters of the Obvious.
Stay tuned for all the obsessive-compulsive fun of Words Have Meanings.

Brandon Brooks

  • Member
  • Posts: 1177
GSF 50 Greatest List - RESULTS THREAD
« Reply #319 on: September 10, 2006, 10:34:56 PM »
[quote name=\'Matt Ottinger\' post=\'130956\' date=\'Sep 10 2006, 09:15 PM\']
[color=\"#009900\"]3 The Pyramid (1973-80, 1981, 1982-88, 1991-92, 2002-04)[/color]
(3493 79/80)(11 first place votes)(GSN: 8)(TVG: 6)

[color=\"#009900\"]2 Jeopardy! (1964-75, 1978-79, 1984-present)[/color]
(3494 79/80)(13 first place votes)(GSN: 2)(TVG: 2)
[/quote]
My favorite game show of all time is third place because of ONE POINT?!

[font=\"Arial Black\"]NOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!![/font][/size]
« Last Edit: September 10, 2006, 10:35:11 PM by Brandon Brooks »

JasonA1

  • Executive Producer
  • Posts: 3147
GSF 50 Greatest List - RESULTS THREAD
« Reply #320 on: September 10, 2006, 10:37:45 PM »
Egads, I didn't even look. It was getting close at the top. Not shocked that Price ran away with it though. I am shocked that Wheel didn't crack the top 5 and MG did.

-Jason
Game Show Forum Muckety-Muck

clemon79

  • Member
  • Posts: 27680
  • Director of Suck Consolidation
GSF 50 Greatest List - RESULTS THREAD
« Reply #321 on: September 10, 2006, 10:41:43 PM »
[quote name=\'Modor\' post=\'130952\' date=\'Sep 10 2006, 06:59 PM\']
That makes no sense whatsoever.  
[/quote]
Bears repeating.
[quote name=\'Chuck Sutton\' post=\'130955\' date=\'Sep 10 2006, 07:11 PM\']
Webster's new world dictionary
Replace:  "to take of the place of"
It did not take the place of any of them they were all there.
[/quote]
Ohhhhh, I seeee...wait, no, still makes no sense whatsoever.
Chris Lemon, King Fool, Director of Suck Consolidation
http://fredsmythe.com
Email: clemon79@outlook.com  |  Skype: FredSmythe

Don Howard

  • Member
  • Posts: 5729
GSF 50 Greatest List - RESULTS THREAD
« Reply #322 on: September 10, 2006, 10:53:35 PM »
[quote name=\'Matt Ottinger\' post=\'130956\' date=\'Sep 10 2006, 10:15 PM\']
[color=\"#009900\"]5 The Match Game (1962-69, 1973-82, 1990-91)[/color]
(3311 79/80)(6 first place votes)(GSN: 1)(TVG: 10)
[/quote]
Matthew, my Matt, you forgot a version. (1998-99....Michael Burger! George Hamilton! Judy Tenuta!)
I do understand, though, why you'd block it out.

GS Warehouse

  • Guest
GSF 50 Greatest List - RESULTS THREAD
« Reply #323 on: September 10, 2006, 10:56:40 PM »
[quote name=\'clemon79\' post=\'130959\' date=\'Sep 10 2006, 10:41 PM\']Bears repeating.[/quote]We're only in Week 1, but based on what Chicago did to the Packers today, they're on their way.  [ducking]

/vindication for Price fans!
//I didn't submit a list, since I'm not good at playing favorites
///I would have agreed with TPiR at #1, though, because of its longevity
////note to rialtus: Chuck Sutton's definition of "replace" is what we do here at the GSF
/////and that's to not make sense
//////is 6 levels of slashies a record? :-)
« Last Edit: September 11, 2006, 05:10:54 PM by GS Warehouse »

Robert Hutchinson

  • Member
  • Posts: 2333
GSF 50 Greatest List - RESULTS THREAD
« Reply #324 on: September 10, 2006, 10:59:13 PM »
Matt, I hope this pointless sniping wasn't the cause of a lack of comments on the top 5. I've been appreciative of those, myself.

(And I don't want to hear about how anybody has a point. It's not the point of the thread, it's not accomplishing anything--let it die, please.)

Brandon, should I not mention that, had Matt convinced me to submit a list, I would have definitely ranked Pyramid above Jeopardy!?
Visit my CB radio at www.twitter.com/ertchin

Dbacksfan12

  • Member
  • Posts: 6202
  • Just leave the set; that’d be terrific.
GSF 50 Greatest List - RESULTS THREAD
« Reply #325 on: September 10, 2006, 11:04:18 PM »
[quote name=\'Brandon Brooks\' post=\'130957\' date=\'Sep 10 2006, 09:34 PM\']
[quote name=\'Matt Ottinger\' post=\'130956\' date=\'Sep 10 2006, 09:15 PM\']
[color=\"#009900\"]3 The Pyramid (1973-80, 1981, 1982-88, 1991-92, 2002-04)[/color]
(3493 79/80)(11 first place votes)(GSN: 8)(TVG: 6)

[color=\"#009900\"]2 Jeopardy! (1964-75, 1978-79, 1984-present)[/color]
(3494 79/80)(13 first place votes)(GSN: 2)(TVG: 2)
[/quote]
My favorite game show of all time is third place because of ONE POINT?!

[font=\"Arial Black\"]NOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!![/font][/size]
[/quote]
Now I feel bad by ranking it 9th.
--Mark
Phil 4:13

clemon79

  • Member
  • Posts: 27680
  • Director of Suck Consolidation
GSF 50 Greatest List - RESULTS THREAD
« Reply #326 on: September 10, 2006, 11:06:27 PM »
[quote name=\'GS Warehouse\' post=\'130963\' date=\'Sep 10 2006, 07:56 PM\']
[quote name=\'clemon79\' post=\'130959\' date=\'Sep 10 2006, 10:41 PM\']Bears repeating.[/quote]We're only in Week 1, but based on what Chicago did to the Packers today, they're on their way.  [ducking]
[/quote]
I never tire of that joke.

Had I submitted a list, Price still would have been #1, and Pyramid would have been #2.

(Of course, has someone else who didn't submit one do so, there's a good chance that Pyramid gets bumped again, because I can't see myself putting Jeopardy lower than #3.)
Chris Lemon, King Fool, Director of Suck Consolidation
http://fredsmythe.com
Email: clemon79@outlook.com  |  Skype: FredSmythe

Brandon Brooks

  • Member
  • Posts: 1177
GSF 50 Greatest List - RESULTS THREAD
« Reply #327 on: September 10, 2006, 11:22:02 PM »
[quote name=\'Robert Hutchinson\' post=\'130964\' date=\'Sep 10 2006, 09:59 PM\']
Brandon, should I not mention that, had Matt convinced me to submit a list, I would have definitely ranked Pyramid above Jeopardy!?
[/quote]
[font=\"Arial Black\"]NOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!![/font][/size]

I put J! down at number 10, which in retrospect may have been too low.  I love the game and didn't have the heart to put it out of the top ten.  Price was right at number two for me.
« Last Edit: September 10, 2006, 11:27:13 PM by Brandon Brooks »

clemon79

  • Member
  • Posts: 27680
  • Director of Suck Consolidation
GSF 50 Greatest List - RESULTS THREAD
« Reply #328 on: September 10, 2006, 11:23:45 PM »
[quote name=\'Brandon Brooks\' post=\'130974\' date=\'Sep 10 2006, 08:22 PM\']
[font=\"Arial Black\"]NOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!![/font][/size]
[/quote]
Do not want? :)
Chris Lemon, King Fool, Director of Suck Consolidation
http://fredsmythe.com
Email: clemon79@outlook.com  |  Skype: FredSmythe

Chuck Sutton

  • Member
  • Posts: 467
GSF 50 Greatest List - RESULTS THREAD
« Reply #329 on: September 10, 2006, 11:41:14 PM »
Then let me explain in terms even a "ninny" can understand

I was asked two different questions

1. What are the remaining 13 shows on a list of 50 from GSN?

I am stuck with what they all the shows they have already listed.  The question is should the Newlywed Game the Dating Game be on a list of the 50 greatest games ever? Yes, they definitely should and they were on mine at 41 and 42.

Should they be on the list of the top 13? no, they should not. And I wish they were not.  I wish they were where they belonged on the GSN list so one could put The Amazing Race on there and it would not have to "replace" them.   Remember in this question I was asked; I did not have the option of moving Dating and Newlywed down.

So a better show had to be left off so that it would not "replace" two lesser deserving shows that have to be on a list of the 50 greatest somewhere.

Give me the entire list of 50.   "Should"  The Amazing Race "replace"  The Newlywed Game on the list of 50? No, It should not, instead it should replace Dog Eat Dog and Newlywed Game should move down to that spot.(but I did not have that option in this question)

In this senerio, is opposite is also possible and true.  The Newlywed Game "should" not "replace" The Amazing Race on a list of the 50 greatest game shows.

In either case, if someone gave me a list 50 shows and asked "should" you replace on this list The Newlywed Game with The Amazing Race?  The correct answer is no. It "should" not "replace" it.  And visa versa.

In either case, if someone had asked me the follow-up question; "What 'should' GSN have done to put the Amazing Race on the list if 50?", which no one did, I would have answered, "It should have taken Dog Eat Dog, Studs, Love Connection off the list moved Dating Game or Newlywed Game down and put The Amazing Race in the top 10"    

Think about this way if someone put together a list of the 50 greatest shows without Password and then asked you "should" I "replace" Pyramid with Password? Of the correct answer is no.  There are lots of ways to include both.

Don't blame me because you did not ask the right question.


2. I was asked what are the 50 greatest game shows ever?  I gave that answer.

I was not asked either time what "should" be on list of the 13 greatest game shows?  If I had been I would not have answered The Newlywed Game or The Dating Game.

The first piece of advice I give my clients, on the stand, answer the question you are asked and ONLY the question you are asked.  I did that both times.
« Last Edit: September 11, 2006, 12:26:25 AM by Chuck Sutton »