[quote name=\'Matt Ottinger\' post=\'143781\' date=\'Jan 18 2007, 06:18 PM\']
Still, in my mind (and obviously in many others), there's precious little difference between what people try to accomplish on Beat the Clock and what people try to accomplish on Fear Factor. Do the task faster than anybody else, win the prize. If in your particular reality, the differences of being outdoors or of being an hour long or of not providing Rice-A-Roni to the runners-up are significant, then good for you. I don't see how that makes the rest of us "wrong".
[/quote]
The last part of that sounds like someone I used to know on an old message board, but I digress. (For the record, I always thought Rice-A-Roni sucked as a game show prize.)
I could care less if a competition show is an hour long. If I'm to take your "my particular reality" tidbit seriously, that would disqualify Millionaire, Greed, TPIR, and others in the past that have felt the need to go to an hour.
The competition factor is present in almost all of these game-based reality shows (like Fear Factor, Survivor, TAR, and others). The thing that separates them from game shows is the snippets in between the actual competition, like interviews and such. Granted, at least one game show that I can think of off the top of my head had interview snippets in between competition (Weakest Link), but in most of these shows, like Fear Factor, there's very little competition, and they need to find filler somehow- which takes them away from the game show and into the reality show.
It's just a matter of opinion. You (and the others) believe you're right. I don't. But can we at least agree to disagree on it, for now?