[quote name=\'Chuck Sutton\' post=\'149920\' date=\'Apr 10 2007, 07:05 AM\']
[quote name=\'narzo\' post=\'149913\' date=\'Apr 9 2007, 10:44 PM\']
[quote name=\'Jimmy Owen\' post=\'149521\' date=\'Apr 5 2007, 12:40 PM\']
[quote name=\'TLEberle\' post=\'149520\' date=\'Apr 5 2007, 01:24 PM\']
[quote name=\'Jimmy Owen\' post=\'149518\' date=\'Apr 5 2007, 10:08 AM\'] Isn't it better to be the guy who replaced the guy who replaced the legend?[/quote]I really don't see how that makes one lick of difference.
[/quote]
See: Stern, Howard.
[/quote]
see: Norville, Deborah; Newman, Kevin; McRee, Lisa; (and going local) Vascellaro, Frank
[/quote]
See also: George Lazanby and Timothy Dalton
[/quote]
Was it Dan Devine who replaced Lombardi? Or did he replace Ara Parseghian? Anyway, there are a couple of examples from the world of sport.
And Frank Vascellaro! Ha! His problem wasn't replacing a legend, it's that he's as shallow as they come. At least until they brought in his replacement. (Sorry to extend the Minneapolis local news portion of the chat.)