[quote name=\'clemon79\' post=\'151778\' date=\'May 8 2007, 01:48 PM\']
Trust me, if I had a rule like that, and you came to me and said "Yeah, but I've been doing this a million years and I have a great collection (hint: EVERYONE thinks their collection is great) and you should bend the rules for me," I would have ended the conversation a whole damn lot faster than you two apparently did.
[/quote]
I concur. When I was an active trader, I had a few
rules of my own... nothing outrageous and certainly nothing difficult to follow. (Spare me the rhetoric about trading also being a copyright violation; the no-cash rule as stated didn't sound as inane back then. ;-) And yet, I'd still get, er, "less aware" types who would demand -- not request, but demand -- twenty shows from my collection and offer me, say, four from their own. And at least a couple of times,
they wanted to choose the four shows they'd send me.
The topper was still the guy (as with others in this thread, I'm not naming names) who'd "completed" his side of a trade months late (quote marks included because I ended up doing all of the dubbing due to his "broken" VCR that wasn't), and then had the nerve to ask not only for another trade, but for special consideration -- i.e. even more extra work and rule-bending on my part with zero assurance that he'd complete his side -- in said trade. The ultimate in chutzpah: his stated justification was "you can trust me."
Yeah, some of the "trading rules" lists make
War and Peace look like a pamphlet. But unless you want to invite abuse, you have to draw the line somewhere.