Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Three on a Match  (Read 2607 times)

alfonzos

  • Member
  • Posts: 1032
Three on a Match
« on: July 02, 2007, 04:20:26 PM »
3oaM went through at least three format changes during its nearly three year run. IIRC, the last format had the players win three matches against their opponents to win $5000 in prizes. That means that each contest took between two or three days to complete. So that somebody might win something during a episode, The Big Match was added.

The gameboard was set up so that black dots were behind ten of of the twelve choices. The other two choices were drawings of half of a one thousand dollar bill (remember those, oldtimers?). Each player, in turn, chose a box and if one of the half bills was revealed, that player chose one more box and if the other half were there that player won the money. If the money was not won, the bonus accumulated to the next day's jackpot.

In the episodes I saw, each half-bill was in a separate column and the right half was always in a column that was on the right of the left half. My question is: was that always the set up? If so, that was increase the chances of a winner.
A Cliff Saber Production
email address: alfonzos@aol.com
Boardgame Geek user name: alfonzos

Jimmy_1

  • Guest
Three on a Match
« Reply #1 on: July 03, 2007, 09:13:49 PM »
I don't know for sure, but just as an opinion, I don't think they would limit the board positioning that way.  Such limitations would lower the chance for the joackpot to climb high and build excitement.  There was no rule that the prizes in the regular game had to be scrambled (e.g., you could win with 20, 30, and 40 all on the yellow), so I would hope they didn't reduce the possible number of configurations for the dollar bill halves.

Steve Gavazzi

  • Member
  • Posts: 3303
Three on a Match
« Reply #2 on: July 04, 2007, 08:29:49 AM »
[quote name=\'Jimmy_1\' post=\'156635\' date=\'Jul 3 2007, 09:13 PM\']
I don't know for sure, but just as an opinion, I don't think they would limit the board positioning that way.  Such limitations would lower the chance for the joackpot to climb high and build excitement.  There was no rule that the prizes in the regular game had to be scrambled (e.g., you could win with 20, 30, and 40 all on the yellow), so I would hope they didn't reduce the possible number of configurations for the dollar bill halves.
[/quote]

But by Alfonzo's description, the goal wasn't to build excitement.  The goal was to get more winning done than just once every few shows.

HYHYBT

  • Member
  • Posts: 416
Three on a Match
« Reply #3 on: July 04, 2007, 12:04:11 PM »
The idea sounds very similar to the Ten Chances "zero goes last" rule, which certainly does exist.
"If you ask me to repeat this I'm gonna punch you right in the nose" -- Geoff Edwards, Play the Percentages

Neumms

  • Member
  • Posts: 2459
Three on a Match
« Reply #4 on: July 06, 2007, 01:24:23 PM »
[quote name=\'Jimmy_1\' post=\'156635\' date=\'Jul 3 2007, 08:13 PM\']
There was no rule that the prizes in the regular game had to be scrambled (e.g., you could win with 20, 30, and 40 all on the yellow), so I would hope they didn't reduce the possible number of configurations for the dollar bill halves.
[/quote]

In the regular game, the prizes WEREN'T scrambled by column, were they? Wasn't it always one in the $20, one in the $30, one in the $40? So the right half of the bill being to the right of the left half isn't giving away the farm, is it?

alfonzos

  • Member
  • Posts: 1032
Three on a Match
« Reply #5 on: July 06, 2007, 06:35:42 PM »
True, the odds are still against the player but a lucky first guess could increase the odds from 11:1 against (8 1/3%) to 3:1 against (25%).
A Cliff Saber Production
email address: alfonzos@aol.com
Boardgame Geek user name: alfonzos

Matt Ottinger

  • Member
  • Posts: 13018
Three on a Match
« Reply #6 on: July 23, 2007, 06:02:36 PM »
[quote name=\'alfonzos\' post=\'156543\' date=\'Jul 2 2007, 04:20 PM\']In the episodes I saw, each half-bill was in a separate column and the right half was always in a column that was on the right of the left half. My question is: was that always the set up? If so, that was increase the chances of a winner.[/quote]
For the record, I visited Fred Wostbrock last week and had a look at his Three on a Match pictures.  Among them was one clearly taken during game play which had the right half of the bill in the $20 column and the left half of the bill in the $30 column.  So we can now say with certainty that each of the two halves could appear anywhere on the board.  Sleep well, America!
This has been another installment of Matt Ottinger's Masters of the Obvious.
Stay tuned for all the obsessive-compulsive fun of Words Have Meanings.

Robert Hutchinson

  • Member
  • Posts: 2333
Three on a Match
« Reply #7 on: July 23, 2007, 07:30:42 PM »
This is what we needed that Don Pardo memoir for.

Chapter 27: How Many Times Was There a Single Player in Final Jeopardy! During the Fleming Run?
« Last Edit: July 23, 2007, 07:30:56 PM by Robert Hutchinson »
Visit my CB radio at www.twitter.com/ertchin

uncamark

  • Guest
Three on a Match
« Reply #8 on: July 24, 2007, 12:55:17 PM »
[quote name=\'Robert Hutchinson\' post=\'158340\' date=\'Jul 23 2007, 06:30 PM\']
This is what we needed that Don Pardo memoir for.

Chapter 27: How Many Times Was There a Single Player in Final Jeopardy! During the Fleming Run?
[/quote]

"Sorry--I was always grabbing a martini over at Hurley's during Final Jeopardy!"