[quote name=\'chris319\' post=\'159362\' date=\'Aug 2 2007, 06:03 AM\']
All of which could just as easily be solved with better contestant coordinators performing better interviews outside
How do you know this problem is solvable with "better" this and "better" that? From your firsthand observation of the interview process, where do you think it's broken? What question do you ask that'll ferret out the slow bidders from the decisive ones?
[/quote]
It's broken in the sense that the current contestant interviewers have resigned themselves into finding the exact kind of people that we're critical off here on this board. The stoners, the ones with the bright and colorfol specially made t-shirts, the college kids who don't need a grandfather clock for the frat house, and of course, you have to pick a few from the groups that came in wearing the same shirt....
Some of us are old enough to remember that it wasn't always like that.
Can they pick 'better' people? You bet. Whatever questions they were asking prospective players 10-20 years ago, will likely still work today ... And , Gawd forbid, if the questions then were the same as the questions I was asked last year, then make a concious decision to slowly eliminate the loud tshirt wearing freaks. Over time, they'll realize that just by wearing a "I love Drew" t-shirt won't get an automatic pass to play, so they'll stop.
This is fixable.
(and yes, I think Modor's suggestion of holding up a box of corn flakes would weed out a LOT of losers)