[quote name=\'PYLdude\' post=\'166062\' date=\'Oct 9 2007, 01:44 PM\']
[quote name=\'dzinkin\' post=\'166059\' date=\'Oct 9 2007, 01:31 PM\']
[quote name=\'PYLdude\' post=\'166056\' date=\'Oct 9 2007, 01:24 PM\']
Okay. There was no bias intended in my post, and I don't appreciate being slammed for it.
[/quote]
Intended? No. Was it there? Certainly.[/quote]
Then point it out to me, because I don't see it. I really honestly don't.
[/quote]
Definition of
heathen from m-w.com (emphasis mine):
1 : an unconverted member of a people or nation that does not acknowledge the God of the Bible
2 : an uncivilized or irreligious person
Definition of
atheist from m-w.com:
one who believes that there is no deity
Again, one has a negative connotation and one does not.
I don't see WHY this is being made into a federal case. I made a legitimate clue...I didn't think that it was going to be any sort of a problem, because I thought people had more open minds.
I'm not bringing his name into it because I'm diverting attention away from what I said. I'm bringing his name into it because you treated an innocent Scrabble clue like one of his pro-Christian rants, and that's about as far from my post as it was.
You are the one who made it a federal case, because neither I nor Chris said that your post was on the same level as "gay sex causes AIDS." Were you expressing hate or using a severely misguided application of religious beliefs? No. Does that make the term "heathen" completely neutral? No. And telling you that there is a better, more neutral alternative is not "making a federal case."
I'm dropping this now, and I would appreciate it if the same was done on your end.
I would be remiss if I didn't point out that you're doing almost exactly what you criticized someone else for doing
here. As with the word choice, I'm sure that wasn't the intent, but it certainly looks like much the same thing.
That said, yeah, I'm happy to let this go too. Done.