No one here is challenging Fremantle's right to the images, or suggesting Brad has any legal standing as far as they go. (A concept lost on Jeremy, as so many concepts are.) We're saying that it's beyond tacky that they would go about building their website by lifting grainy images from a fan site. Tacky is not the same as illegal.
There's also the matter of them lifting the text descriptions from the site. As any high school civics teacher would tell you, that's plagiarism. Now obviously, Brad is in no position to take Fremantle to court over something that is, in the grand scheme of things, pretty insignificant. But Fremantle has no legal right to Brad's words, even if they are about Fremantle's show. And in court, when it came time to prove intent, the fact that Fremantle took the images from the site would go a long way toward proving that's where the text came from as well.
Jeremy, always nice to hear from you. It helps us all to recognize the right side of an issue when you come down on the opposite one.