[quote name=\'clemon79\' post=\'169497\' date=\'Nov 14 2007, 11:43 AM\']
[quote name=\'rebelwrest\' post=\'169495\' date=\'Nov 14 2007, 08:05 AM\']
You know I've been thinking of a way to fix the show. I'll throw my two cents in. Why not create a strike system. A spoiler must earn two check-marks with two correct answers in order to take one of the main players lecturn away. However, a spoiler can only steal a lecturn when a player gets two strikes. A player only gets a strike when he or she rings in and misses. Also, the spoilers are there for the whole game until a point. Finally, to get rid of a spoiler winning at the last second, a bell rings signifying only 2 minutes left in the game in which the spoilers are removed, and the two players in front play a rapid fire crosswords. The person in the lead wins the game.
[/quote]
...and by the time you finish explaining all of this to your audience, the first question you'll be asking is "Can you come back tomorrow?"
Sadly, your contestants won't be able to hear it over the chirping of all of the crickets.
[/quote]
Lemon, do you really think that if implemented, my explanation will be quoted verbatim on the show. Heck no, it would probably be said in bits and pieces throughout the show.
Ty: Spoilers you can replace a contestant once you get two correct answers, but you can only replace a contestant who has guessed wrong twice.
Third part of show (last seqment of main game)
Ty: Remember when the bell rings only the two people in front gets to continue on with the game.
After bell rings:
Ty: Spoilers, thanks for playing. Now its time for rapid crosswords. We'll go fast for two minutes. The one of you with the most cash wins. Good luck, starts the two minutes........Now.