Author Topic: "Million $ Password" update. (Read 10226 times)

Gus · « **Reply #45 on:** December 22, 2007, 12:48:07 PM »

[quote name=\'whoserman\' post=\'172786\' date=\'Dec 22 2007, 11:01 AM\']"Because your wife isn't good enough, but her sister is hawter than a gas-powered barbecue..."[/quote])pbuzz ;-)

mbclev · « **Reply #46 on:** December 22, 2007, 02:15:42 PM »

[quote name=\'chris319\' post=\'172203\' date=\'Dec 16 2007, 07:39 AM\']

Quote

allot is a legal word, but if the Password is "several" do you say no because the giver more likely said"a lot"?

"Allot" is a legal clue, but a bad one for the password in question, so the contestant basically shot herself in the foot. This is all spelled out in the rules.
[/quote]

This is similar to what happened on Super Password during a Tournament of Losers, I think. It was during a bonus game; the password was "often," and Constance McCashin said what I thought was "a lot," and I thought she was going to get flagged for an illegal clue. It was only later, when I was taking a business class in college, that I saw the word "allot," and then it hit me regarding this rule. (Bert Convy, unfortunately, never bothered to explain this ruling to the home audience.)

Jimmy Owen · « **Reply #47 on:** December 22, 2007, 02:28:28 PM »

Why don't we just modify the Pasword rules to allow for two word clues and see if they can't Get the Message.

TLEberle · « **Reply #48 on:** December 22, 2007, 05:59:27 PM »

[quote name=\'Jimmy Owen\' post=\'172795\' date=\'Dec 22 2007, 11:28 AM\']
Why don't we just modify the Pasword rules to allow for two word clues and see if they can't Get the Message.
[/quote]I chortled.

tpirfan28 · « **Reply #49 on:** December 22, 2007, 07:14:29 PM »

[quote name=\'Jimmy Owen\' post=\'172795\' date=\'Dec 22 2007, 02:28 PM\']
Why don't we just modify the Pasword rules to allow for two word clues and see if they can't Get the Message.
[/quote]
I had to look it up....VERY well played.