More Price is Right DVD news...

[Steve Gavazzi]

[quote name=\'dale_grass\' post=\'175903\' date=\'Jan 22 2008, 03:46 PM\'][quote name=\'dzinkin\' post=\'175901\' date=\'Jan 22 2008, 04:39 PM\']Prediction: an outtake that shows Bob telling a contestant, "I have a pot of gold... IN MY PANTS."
[/quote]
That was the original premise to It's In the Bag.
[/quote]
I always wondered why that game got delayed a whole year...

[rigsby]

And what, pray tell, does that have to do with a post written by ClockGameJohn?

CGJ contacted BCI, and BCI appears to be kowtowing to Bob regarding everything else on this DVD set...

Whatever.  I'm just not expecting much from this, and that includes whatever the pot of gold is.

[clemon79]

[quote name=\'Steve Gavazzi\' post=\'175902\' date=\'Jan 22 2008, 12:41 PM\']
And what, pray tell, does that have to do with a post written by ClockGameJohn?
[/quote]
Yer getting awfully defensive, man. Why was it an unrealistic guess?

[Steve Gavazzi]

[quote name=\'rigsby\' post=\'175905\' date=\'Jan 22 2008, 03:49 PM\']

And what, pray tell, does that have to do with a post written by ClockGameJohn?

CGJ contacted BCI, and BCI appears to be kowtowing to Bob regarding everything else on this DVD set...[/quote]
Lemme explain something to you here.  We don't work for BCI, and while I'm not gonna say we've never done any kind of promotion for them, we don't work for the show, either.  We work for our fellow fans, and when we see something we think is going to get them excited that we can't release immediately, we like to build a little suspense in the meantime.  The 50 billionth airing of the tube top incident doesn't meet those standards.

[quote name=\'rigsby\' post=\'175905\' date=\'Jan 22 2008, 03:49 PM\']Whatever.  I'm just not expecting much from this, and that includes whatever the pot of gold is.
[/quote]
Well, if you want to ignore the obvious hints otherwise, that's up to you.

[Steve Gavazzi]

[quote name=\'clemon79\' post=\'175907\' date=\'Jan 22 2008, 03:54 PM\'][quote name=\'Steve Gavazzi\' post=\'175902\' date=\'Jan 22 2008, 12:41 PM\']And what, pray tell, does that have to do with a post written by ClockGameJohn?
[/quote]Yer getting awfully defensive, man. Why was it an unrealistic guess?
[/quote]Because I would like to think we're a little better than to create hype for something all of us have seen a hundred times already.

I think I can say this much without getting in trouble:  If you didn't see the "pot of gold" in question on its original broadcast, then you haven't seen it.

[clemon79]

[quote name=\'Steve Gavazzi\' post=\'175909\' date=\'Jan 22 2008, 01:00 PM\']
Because I would like to think we're a little better than to create hype for something all of us have seen a hundred times already.[/quote]
So would I, but your outright admission of astroturfing in the few posts above certainly brings that into question.

[Steve Gavazzi]

[quote name=\'clemon79\' post=\'175910\' date=\'Jan 22 2008, 04:07 PM\']
[quote name=\'Steve Gavazzi\' post=\'175909\' date=\'Jan 22 2008, 01:00 PM\']
Because I would like to think we're a little better than to create hype for something all of us have seen a hundred times already.[/quote]
So would I, but your outright admission of astroturfing in the few posts above certainly brings that into question.
[/quote]
Well, let me rephrase that.  If there's a $1,000,000 Spectacular to coming up, we're going to have ads for it on our front page, and for all we know, the show could be skunked.  If there's a DVD collection coming out (I think I heard something about one of those...), we're going to have some promotion for that, too, because hey, it's supposed to be our favorite show.  If we go out of our way to single out one particular aspect of the DVD...that's a hint that it might be something a little out of the ordinary.

[Ian Wallis]

I think I can say this much without getting in trouble: If you didn't see the "pot of gold" in question on its original broadcast, then you haven't seen it.

Hmmm...this sounds like something that probably wasn't seen on GSN then.  I wonder if Barker has relented and allowed an episode that was previously vetoed.

/On the other hand, does Barker even know the meaning of the word relent?

[Jimmy Owen]

Selfishly, I'm gonna buy it for the last Zeke Week alone.  I forgot to tape it when it was on and to have it on crystal clear DVD is fantastic.  Also want the Cullen eps on DVD.

[BrandonFG]

[quote name=\'dale_grass\' post=\'175903\' date=\'Jan 22 2008, 03:46 PM\']
[quote name=\'dzinkin\' post=\'175901\' date=\'Jan 22 2008, 04:39 PM\']
Prediction: an outtake that shows Bob telling a contestant, "I have a pot of gold... IN MY PANTS."
[/quote]

That was the original premise to It's In the Bag.  Or was it Pick a Pair?
[/quote]
I lol'd. Well played!

[Dbacksfan12]

[quote name=\'Steve Gavazzi\' post=\'175908\' date=\'Jan 22 2008, 03:58 PM\']
[quote name=\'rigsby\' post=\'175905\' date=\'Jan 22 2008, 03:49 PM\']Whatever.  I'm just not expecting much from this, and that includes whatever the pot of gold is.[/quote]Well, if you want to ignore the obvious hints otherwise, that's up to you.[/quote]All that's been indicated is that there's a "pot of gold". Aside from the premiere, and perhaps the Cullen episodes, I don't see how that makes expectations rise much higher.

Certainly not worth the asking price.

[Steve Gavazzi]

[quote name=\'Modor\' post=\'175925\' date=\'Jan 22 2008, 06:46 PM\'][quote name=\'Steve Gavazzi\' post=\'175908\' date=\'Jan 22 2008, 03:58 PM\'][quote name=\'rigsby\' post=\'175905\' date=\'Jan 22 2008, 03:49 PM\']Whatever.  I'm just not expecting much from this, and that includes whatever the pot of gold is.[/quote]Well, if you want to ignore the obvious hints otherwise, that's up to you.[/quote]All that's been indicated is that there's a "pot of gold". Aside from the premiere, and perhaps the Cullen episodes, I don't see how that makes expectations rise much higher.[/quote]
Mark, you hate everything.  They could release the whole run with Barker digitally edited out, and you still wouldn't be excited.

[Dbacksfan12]

[quote name=\'Steve Gavazzi\' post=\'175929\' date=\'Jan 22 2008, 07:01 PM\']
[quote name=\'Modor\' post=\'175925\' date=\'Jan 22 2008, 06:46 PM\'][quote name=\'Steve Gavazzi\' post=\'175908\' date=\'Jan 22 2008, 03:58 PM\'][quote name=\'rigsby\' post=\'175905\' date=\'Jan 22 2008, 03:49 PM\']Whatever.  I'm just not expecting much from this, and that includes whatever the pot of gold is.[/quote]Well, if you want to ignore the obvious hints otherwise, that's up to you.[/quote]All that's been indicated is that there's a "pot of gold". Aside from the premiere, and perhaps the Cullen episodes, I don't see how that makes expectations rise much higher.[/quote]

Mark, you hate everything.  They could release the whole run with Barker digitally edited out, and you still wouldn't be excited.

They could release the whole run with Barker digitally edited out, and you still wouldn't be excited.[/quote]I'll thank you not to put words in my mouth.

I think I've stated previously what would make me "excited".  Episodes hand-picked because a certain egomaniac seems to have gotten his way (again) doesn't constitute that.  I've noticed others can complain, but Mark gives an opinion and zap.

[clemon79]

[quote name=\'Modor\' post=\'175930\' date=\'Jan 22 2008, 04:06 PM\']
I've noticed others can complain, but Mark gives an opinion and zap.
[/quote]
(See Wolf, Boy Who Cried)

[Steve Gavazzi]

[quote name=\'Modor\' post=\'175930\' date=\'Jan 22 2008, 07:06 PM\']I'll thank you not to put words in my mouth.[/quote]
Dude, I don't need to put words in your mouth.  You've got umpteen hundred posts here that make the statement just fine by themselves.