[quote name=\'Craig Karlberg\' post=\'181441\' date=\'Mar 15 2008, 04:09 AM\']
Boy, they were looking for "easier" FJ!s after a string of triple stumpers recently. Whenever there's a triple stumper, odds are the show's on a budget. In this case, this was clearly "giveway" mode(not just the clue, but the winnings these days). Don't be surprised if we see a triple stumper sometime next week.[/quote]
I'll take "Making Stuff Up" for a thousand, Alex.
Jeopardy material is prepared far in advance, games are packaged as a unit, and the decision about which one of a set of games to be played that day is made (blindly, I believe) by someone from Standards and Practices, not the show. Some Final Jeopardy clues are easier than others, some are harder. This one happened to be easier. There might very well be a Triple Stumper next week, but it won't be a conscious choice and it won't have anything to do with this softball.
Having said that...
[quote name=\'jalman\' post=\'181466\' date=\'Mar 15 2008, 09:46 AM\']
I've seen easier FJs, IMO. The one about the university (Florida) winning both football and basketball national championships was probably the easiest one. I don't worry about the writers' capabilities, though.[/quote]
And somebody who doesn't follow collegiate sports would consider that a killer.
[quote name=\'jalman\' post=\'181466\' date=\'Mar 15 2008, 09:46 AM\']
I didn't get the Jimmy Buffet one immediately either. I wasn't a contestant so I'm not getting worked up about it.
....
I'm not a music aficionado, sorry.[/quote]
Precisely. A Jimmy Buffet reference is certainly on the easier side of things, but not exactly a crime against the trivia gods.