Author Topic: Syndication front (Read 89241 times)

KWJCDon · « **Reply #45 on:** July 22, 2008, 11:09:39 PM »

Oh all of you hush. LOL Class of 77....Oy......

Don

Sodboy13 · « **Reply #46 on:** July 22, 2008, 11:30:19 PM »

[quote name=\'uncamark\' post=\'191745\' date=\'Jul 22 2008, 05:07 PM\']

In that rough time frame, Clark "$100K Pyramid," Raferty "Card Sharks" (two years after the rest of the nation!), "Matchmaker" and a fourth show I don't remember right now. In prime time.

[/quote]

How on Earth did I miss that? My only memory of seeing Rafferty CS was on one of those rare days when the aerial would pick up stations from Milwaukee and Grand Rapids.

/remembers WFLD's B&E primetime block fondly, with an occasional dash of Catch Phrase
//Perfect Match & Davidson Pyramid, not so much

comicus · « **Reply #47 on:** July 23, 2008, 12:08:11 AM »

[quote name=\'PYLdude\' post=\'191751\' date=\'Jul 22 2008, 06:53 PM\']
[quote name=\'uncamark\' post=\'191745\' date=\'Jul 22 2008, 05:07 PM\']
I'm now guessing that "TP" will replace "Temptation" at 1 p.m. Lots of love, Rossi.
[/quote]

Well, Charmin is a lot more entertaining than "Temptation" ever was...

[/quote]
Yes, yes, we all find Rossi Morreale to be quite Charmin.

rugrats1 · « **Reply #48 on:** July 23, 2008, 08:14:02 AM »

[quote name=\'vtown7\' post=\'191777\' date=\'Jul 22 2008, 10:30 PM\']
/NTV isn't pleased right now; they've shunted Wheel and J! out of their 5-6 pm block to 4-5 am.
[/quote]

Provided that they're not pre-empted for Geoff Stirling's occasional late-night diatribes.

vtown7 · « **Reply #49 on:** July 23, 2008, 08:26:09 AM »

[quote name=\'rugrats1\' post=\'191814\' date=\'Jul 23 2008, 08:14 AM\']
[quote name=\'vtown7\' post=\'191777\' date=\'Jul 22 2008, 10:30 PM\']
/NTV isn't pleased right now; they've shunted Wheel and J! out of their 5-6 pm block to 4-5 am.
[/quote]

Provided that they're not pre-empted for Geoff Stirling's occasional late-night diatribes.
[/quote]

Do they still do that? I figured that all they showed at late night was 80% of a music video or that NFB feature with Smallwood and Stirling.

R.

Obgameshows: One Newfoundlander made it on DoND Canada, despite having to fly by helicopter to the closest casting call, in Halifax.

Dbacksfan12 · « **Reply #50 on:** July 23, 2008, 10:31:39 AM »

[quote name=\'Sodboy13\' post=\'191705\' date=\'Jul 22 2008, 02:03 PM\']Buzzerblog and Hollywood Junket had this a couple weeks ago as an isolated incident on a couples' week taping. The two blew through all the high amounts, to a point where $500 was the big number on the board, so tape was stopped, and they were sent on their merry way with the high amount on the board. Doesn't make the practice any more savory or defensible, but it seems to be more of an "occurrence" than the hard-and-fast "rule" the Perf would make it out to be.
[/quote]How brilliant. S&P doesn't have any issue with something like this?

clemon79 · « **Reply #51 on:** July 23, 2008, 11:34:41 AM »

[quote name=\'Modor\' post=\'191826\' date=\'Jul 23 2008, 07:31 AM\']
How brilliant. S&P doesn't have any issue with something like this?[/quote]
Why would they? S&P's job is to make sure the game is played fairly. Since there's no opponent that would get screwed from this, calling the game off and saying "okay, we'll just give you the most you can possibly win at this point" is not only fair, it's advantageous in the player's favor.

Really, it makes sense. I'm sure somewhere a DoND beancounter figured out that giving someone $500 (or whatever; I'm sure they figured out exactly where the line is) and stopping the game is cheaper that whatever the production costs would be (and in this case "production costs" are more than just studio time, or, indeed, money) to continue playing out a stinker.

weaklink75 · « **Reply #52 on:** July 23, 2008, 12:26:49 PM »

Buzzerblog is reporting on some of the possible (they're still in rehersals) changes for WWTBAM next season- Some of them are a little disconcerting to me...others are interesting..

Mr. Armadillo · « **Reply #53 on:** July 23, 2008, 01:33:34 PM »

[quote name=\'clemon79\' post=\'191828\' date=\'Jul 23 2008, 10:34 AM\']
I'm sure they figured out exactly where the line is) and stopping the game is cheaper that whatever the production costs would be (and in this case "production costs" are more than just studio time, or, indeed, money) to continue playing out a stinker.
[/quote]
But the 'stinker' is one of the best reasons for me to watch! Why would I want to tune in if there isn't the possibility of watching a complete 'Epic Fail' in progress?

aaron sica · « **Reply #54 on:** July 23, 2008, 01:44:59 PM »

[quote name=\'Sodboy13\' post=\'191705\' date=\'Jul 22 2008, 03:03 PM\']
Buzzerblog and Hollywood Junket had this a couple weeks ago as an isolated incident on a couples' week taping. The two blew through all the high amounts, to a point where $500 was the big number on the board, so tape was stopped, and they were sent on their merry way with the high amount on the board. Doesn't make the practice any more savory or defensible, but it seems to be more of an "occurrence" than the hard-and-fast "rule" the Perf would make it out to be.
[/quote]

At this point a name change for the show should be in order. Something like "Deal, no Deal, or whatever we feel should hit the cutting room floor".

SRIV94 · « **Reply #55 on:** July 23, 2008, 01:51:23 PM »

[quote name=\'Mr. Armadillo\' post=\'191842\' date=\'Jul 23 2008, 12:33 PM\']
But the 'stinker' is one of the best reasons for me to watch! Why would I want to tune in if there isn't the possibility of watching a complete 'Epic Fail' in progress?
[/quote]
I could be completely off base, but I'd consider an Epic Fail on DoND to be more of "you're down to one large case and (n < 6) smaller cases, and you go anyway and open the one large case" rather than "you've opened every large case in the first three rounds." In the first scenario, you had a chance to escape with good money and blew it; in the other case you never really had the chance to escape with good money.

OTOH, I could see where the latter would be classified an Epic Fail. But the former is more interesting to watch.

rigsby · « **Reply #56 on:** July 23, 2008, 02:18:45 PM »

[quote name=\'SRIV94\' post=\'191845\' date=\'Jul 23 2008, 12:51 PM\']I could be completely off base, but I'd consider an Epic Fail on DoND to be more of "you're down to one large case and (n < 6) smaller cases, and you go anyway and open the one large case" rather than "you've opened every large case in the first three rounds." In the first scenario, you had a chance to escape with good money and blew it; in the other case you never really had the chance to escape with good money.

OTOH, I could see where the latter would be classified an Epic Fail. But the former is more interesting to watch.
[/quote]
The difference between the two cases is that in the latter case, I would be more inclined to feel sorry for the contestant. In the former case, I would be much more inclined to laugh derisively.

/wait, isn't that basically what you said originally?

clemon79 · « **Reply #57 on:** July 23, 2008, 02:25:25 PM »

Exactly. The Nelson Muntz moment is when someone gets *too* greedy. A player who opens up all of the reds is guilty only of bad luck.

tpirfan28 · « **Reply #58 on:** July 23, 2008, 02:59:14 PM »

[quote name=\'clemon79\' post=\'191852\' date=\'Jul 23 2008, 02:25 PM\']
Exactly. The Nelson Muntz moment is when someone gets *too* greedy. A player who opens up all of the reds is guilty only of bad luck.
[/quote]
Correct. I do feel for the people who blow through all the big cases in at least the first two rounds, if not the first round alone. That sucks. People who give up massive $100K+ bank offers only to get $5? Ha ha.

SRIV94 · « **Reply #59 on:** July 23, 2008, 03:10:45 PM »

[quote name=\'rigsby\' post=\'191849\' date=\'Jul 23 2008, 01:18 PM\']
/wait, isn't that basically what you said originally?
[/quote]
I didn't really say everything I said.

/Gotta love Yogi.