[quote name=\'Steve Gavazzi\' post=\'205034\' date=\'Dec 29 2008, 10:33 PM\']Well, then I'd still love to hear how his opinion did the 180 that it did, going from "Double Prices is the best game on the show" to "Double Prices is an unnecessary game that I wouldn't blame them for retiring." I'm sure it's a
very interesting explanation, especially given the unusual premise that he started out by proclaiming so strongly.
[/quote]When I first started watching the show, I did so primarily to see people win. (This was mentioned in the post you linked to.) I therefore gravitated towards the games that people won more often, and those are the quickies. I've grown to appreciate other aspects of the show besides just the wins, and also some of the longer, less won games. There are some longer games I don't like (Switcheroo immediately comes to mind with 3 Strikes closely following) because they aren't won often, but others I do (It's In The Bag and 1/2 Off). Uhhh...that's it, pretty much. BTW, I see through your phony "curiosity" and recognize your comment for the backhanded attempt on my character it was. Nice to see it backfire rather quickly, though. You can bet that one thing hasn't changed, Gavazzi. I still think you're a pompous, self-righteous jerk who's afraid of change. Take comfort in that.
Don't argue that it sucks because it's old, because you've already had your cake and eaten it too.
But I'm not arguing that
at all. I'm arguing against
your point that solely because of it's age means it's good or somehow worthy of not being retired.