Author Topic: Match Game 85 (Read 40538 times)

Don Howard · « **Reply #15 on:** February 24, 2009, 03:49:49 PM »

[quote name=\'aaron sica\' post=\'208717\' date=\'Feb 24 2009, 01:14 PM\']
I wonder if the 1985 year had anything to do with the book "Total Television" listing 1985 as a year that MG was on...
[/quote]
Given their propensity for accuracy, I suspect that is exactly how 1985 came to be considered the target year.

chris319 · « **Reply #16 on:** February 25, 2009, 03:06:02 PM »

Quote

Someone told that story once during a radio interview, but attributed it to the 1990 revival of MG. Said that old Gene was signed, sealed and delivered, until the producers realized Gene was that old. Tell you the truth, I had no idea he was as old as he was when I was enjoying him on the 7x series.

Oh, and the person in that radio interview? Hardly an Internet hacker. Guy's name was Charles Nelson Reilly.

What I've heard from people inside the company is that Bert Convy was their first choice for '90, until he became unavailable for obvious reasons. Gene was not considered for that version. Goodson knew how old Gene was, so I dispute Charles' account of it.

BillCullen1 · « **Reply #17 on:** February 25, 2009, 03:18:31 PM »

IIRC, Gene appeared on a talk show in the 90s (might have been Geraldo, not sure). He said Mark Goodson pitched the MG '90 pilot to ABC with him as the host. When ET revealed his age, ABC told Goodson "We want a younger guy." I think Art Fleming was on the same show and CNR called in to talk to Gene.

Goodson didn't have a problem with age, the networks did. Rayburn, Cullen, Ludden and Barker all worked for Goodson when they were over 60.

Matt Ottinger · « **Reply #18 on:** February 25, 2009, 05:31:20 PM »

[quote name=\'BillCullen1\' post=\'208829\' date=\'Feb 25 2009, 03:18 PM\'] When ET revealed his age, ABC told Goodson "We want a younger guy." [/quote]
I know this is the story, but I also know this is the story as told by Gene who might have a slightly biased view of the whole thing, you think? It makes for an interesting story, which is what entertainers like Gene and CNR know how to do to elicit sympathy, but to my knowledge no one's ever corroborated it.

PYLdude · « **Reply #19 on:** February 25, 2009, 06:44:12 PM »

[quote name=\'chris319\' post=\'208828\' date=\'Feb 25 2009, 03:06 PM\']

Quote

Someone told that story once during a radio interview, but attributed it to the 1990 revival of MG. Said that old Gene was signed, sealed and delivered, until the producers realized Gene was that old. Tell you the truth, I had no idea he was as old as he was when I was enjoying him on the 7x series.

Oh, and the person in that radio interview? Hardly an Internet hacker. Guy's name was Charles Nelson Reilly.

What I've heard from people inside the company is that Bert Convy was their first choice for '90, until he became unavailable for obvious reasons. Gene was not considered for that version. Goodson knew how old Gene was, so I dispute Charles' account of it.
[/quote]

I raise the following, though, just because I think it kinda sounds plausible...

Even though Goodson had the final say (for obvious reasons), do you think that if enough of his staff raised a stink over Rayburn's age, would it have been enough to sway him to go somewhere else if indeed he was the first choice?

chris319 · « **Reply #20 on:** February 25, 2009, 10:36:28 PM »

By 1990 Rayburn had already been let go from Break the Bank, so perhaps some combination of Goodson and ABC agreed that Rayburn's best days were behind him. My memory is dim -- was Mike Brockman at ABC at the time?

Toward the end of the Brett and Charles version, Goodson was unhappy with the show in general and Gene in particular (I read the memo).

DoorNumberFour · « **Reply #21 on:** February 25, 2009, 10:45:14 PM »

[quote name=\'chris319\' post=\'208856\' date=\'Feb 25 2009, 10:36 PM\']
Toward the end of the Brett and Charles version, Goodson was unhappy with the show in general and Gene in particular (I read the memo).
[/quote]
That's interesting. Why?

TimK2003 · « **Reply #22 on:** February 26, 2009, 09:03:57 AM »

[quote name=\'DoorNumberFour\' post=\'208859\' date=\'Feb 25 2009, 11:45 PM\']
[quote name=\'chris319\' post=\'208856\' date=\'Feb 25 2009, 10:36 PM\']
Toward the end of the Brett and Charles version, Goodson was unhappy with the show in general and Gene in particular (I read the memo).
[/quote]
That's interesting. Why?
[/quote]

I don't have any credible reasoning as to why Mr. Goodson was unhappy about the show in its final years, but I didn't like the show's final years either.

My reason is that the shows were edited so much (they trimmed down the think music/contestant banter to 2 or 3 seconds). There were many times in which before I could think of a good answer they were already repeating the contestant's response.

/This era of Match Game would make Jeopardy look like Primetime Deal or No Deal in terms of speed.

DoorNumberFour · « **Reply #23 on:** February 26, 2009, 12:04:34 PM »

[quote name=\'TimK2003\' post=\'208869\' date=\'Feb 26 2009, 09:03 AM\']
[quote name=\'DoorNumberFour\' post=\'208859\' date=\'Feb 25 2009, 11:45 PM\']
[quote name=\'chris319\' post=\'208856\' date=\'Feb 25 2009, 10:36 PM\']
Toward the end of the Brett and Charles version, Goodson was unhappy with the show in general and Gene in particular (I read the memo).
[/quote]
That's interesting. Why?
[/quote]
I don't have any credible reasoning as to why Mr. Goodson was unhappy about the show in its final years, but I didn't like the show's final years either.
[/quote]
I agree, the editing of the celebrity banter took a lot of entertainment value out of the show. Also, a lot of the "crazy antics" during those episodes seemed forced...Gene running around the studio as part of his entrance, switching positions with Betty, McLean, Charles, etc.

BrandonFG · « **Reply #24 on:** February 26, 2009, 02:26:52 PM »

[quote name=\'DoorNumberFour\' post=\'208876\' date=\'Feb 26 2009, 12:04 PM\']
I agree, the editing of the celebrity banter took a lot of entertainment value out of the show. Also, a lot of the "crazy antics" during those episodes seemed forced...Gene running around the studio as part of his entrance, switching positions with Betty, McLean, Charles, etc.
[/quote]
I couldn't think of the right way to explain why I'm not a fan of the latter episodes, but this about sums it up, so thank you. :-)

I think the editing and the loss of Richard both hurt the show. Richard had great chemistry with the cast, and it was sorely missed when he left. McLean was okay, and so was Bill Daily, but the chemistry just wasn't there like with Richard.

colonial · « **Reply #25 on:** February 26, 2009, 02:32:19 PM »

Around the time MG90 premiered, I remember reading a Gene Rayburn interview from (I think) AP where he claimed he openly lobbied to host the show (not sure if this was before or after Convy pulled out), but was turned down for being "too old," then claimed "Entertainment Tonight" revealing his age to the world ruined his career. He also criticized Ross Shafer's hosting of the show.

It's odd that Rayburn would openly complain about his age being revealed to the world when, for years, his age was revealed at least once a year in the AP's "This Day in History/Happy Birthday" release, and was published in numerous newspapers and broadcast on numerous radio and TV stations. It certainly could not be a secret in Hollywood.

While age may have been a factor in Rayburn not getting the chance to host revivals in 1987 and 1990, I have to wonder if he brought himself down for becoming cantankerous and difficult in his later years. Perhaps he had a reputation in the 60s and 70s, but little has been revealed. What's known about his "negative reputation" seem to focus on the 80s and 90s. (MG/HS battles over Jon Bauman and show quality, leaving BtB85, interviews over the "ET incident" and MG90, openly criticizing his successors, etc.)

Neumms · « **Reply #26 on:** February 26, 2009, 03:34:38 PM »

[quote name=\'DoorNumberFour\' post=\'208859\' date=\'Feb 25 2009, 10:45 PM\']
[quote name=\'chris319\' post=\'208856\' date=\'Feb 25 2009, 10:36 PM\']
Toward the end of the Brett and Charles version, Goodson was unhappy with the show in general and Gene in particular (I read the memo).
[/quote]
That's interesting. Why?
[/quote]

While awaiting Chris's response, I wonder if it's how the drinks hit them. In earlier years, they would be tipsy and delightful. In the syndicated years, they looked tired. Gene seemed to go through the motions, letting the game slide. He did seem to get a huge kick out of McLean. I do, too, but McLean never really shifted into game mode like other panelists did.

calliaume · « **Reply #27 on:** February 26, 2009, 07:23:44 PM »

Remember Goodson wasn't (allegedly) particularly happy with the show's humor to begin with.

The last couple of years were pretty bad, but mostly because there weren't any "new" additions to the panel that people liked. I mean, I know people here liked McLean, but by 1981, he pretty much carried the stench of failure with him, deserved or not. And the show needed a little influx of youth -- when the show started, irregulars like Elaine Joyce, Fannie Flagg, and Patti Deutsch were still in their late 20s, but by the end, who was really young? Debralee Scott?

I can see how people missed Gene's age -- anyone who had been in the business for awhile should have been able to piece together he was at least in his 60s, but I don't think they thought he was 70 in 1987. There were no 70-year-old hosts at that point.

TimK2003 · « **Reply #28 on:** February 26, 2009, 07:31:49 PM »

[quote name=\'colonial\' post=\'208891\' date=\'Feb 26 2009, 03:32 PM\']
Around the time MG90 premiered, I remember reading a Gene Rayburn interview from (I think) AP where he claimed he openly lobbied to host the show (not sure if this was before or after Convy pulled out), but was turned down for being "too old," then claimed "Entertainment Tonight" revealing his age to the world ruined his career. He also criticized Ross Shafer's hosting of the show.
[/quote]

IMHO, if anything hurt Gene's career. or brought his chances down on hosting another MG revival, it would have been his performance on the Match Game/Hollywood Squares Hour. Granted, the quality of the show wasn't as good, and they had a lot more stiffs on MGHSH than the on 7x run...

Jimmy Owen · « **Reply #29 on:** February 26, 2009, 08:04:55 PM »

MGHS had nothing to do with that. Trade magazine ads for a new version with Gene as host ran during a subsequent NATPE. A good portion of this forum is surmising now it must have been for fall 87. That makes sense because Goodson had TPIR in strip syndication for 85-86 and Card Sharks for 86-87.