[quote name=\'CarShark\' post=\'222124\' date=\'Aug 5 2009, 06:40 PM\'][quote name=\'Jay Temple\' post=\'222121\' date=\'Aug 5 2009, 06:12 PM\'][quote name=\'Twentington\' post=\'222071\' date=\'Aug 5 2009, 01:24 PM\'][quote name=\'Neumms\' post=\'222062\' date=\'Aug 5 2009, 12:50 PM\']Here's a clue I found funky. It came up on a $25K episode last week or the week before, can't remember the male celebrity who said it. "Things You Fail" was the subject, the clue was "an F-marked test" or "an F-scored test." That was NOT buzzed, and I believe they won the big money. Isn't "F" synonymous with "fail?"[/quote]
Agreed. If saying the first letter gets you a cuckoo in the maingame (unless the category already dictates that all of the words begin with a certain letter), it should also get you a buzz in the WC.
[/quote]
I caught that too. In fact, I think they have buzzed it in the Winner's Circle. ISTR the clue "an R.N." for THINGS THAT ARE REGISTERED.
[/quote]
I don't know if the two situations are analogous, though. R.N. does stand for "registered nurse", but I haven't seen anything that says F is an intial for "fail".
[/quote]
true to all of that. Does anyone out there recall the time that dick stopped a $10,000 celebration because he feared the judge would retract the win during the commercial? The celeb gave the clue "Red China" for "Communist Countries". It could have been considered either descriptive or a synonym. The end result was neither, the win remained intact. Or the time the celebrity gave the clue "UCLA" for "Names of Colleges and Universities"? Again, the win was questioned going into break, and again it stood. (the explination given was that of the differing rules from the front game to the winner's circle.) There were questionable buzzes that were remedied on the spot--they came back from commercial and gave the contestant another shot at the box with the estimated remaining time: Buzzing a "Tropical Bird" for "Exotic Things" and buzzing "Magnets" for "Attractive Things". (the latter was simply a matter of awarding the $25000 as the contestant provided the right answer as the buzzer sounded) I think it should be noted that the judge always appeared to be tyring to make fair decisions, even reversing them as necessary after more critical thought. This leads me to believe that the judging of the game was not EXACTLY a science. However it got me thinking, has anyone here actually been on the program? And if so, do you remember the rules furnished to you prior to the start of the game? If there were a source rule book or reference guide, aside from the rules from the 'copy of the Pyramid home game', it would definitely help.