[quote name=\'clemon79\' post=\'227452\' date=\'Oct 2 2009, 11:45 AM\']I can verify that, but, as a satisfied user of said product, I can tell you with certainty that the design change on the lid did not change the price of the product one iota.[/quote]
Fair enough...I don't buy the things, and I just assumed it was a more expensive feature to the existing product...not something that comes standard in Gladware, etc. I did some Google and could not find an intro date for the product. It's hard to believe Gladware is 10 years old, FWIW.
[quote name=\'clemon79\' post=\'227452\' date=\'Oct 2 2009, 11:45 AM\'](By your own argument, incidentally, none of the products you've suggested are "fair", either, because I promise you that the size of the candy bar. bag of marshmallows, can of cooking spray, whatever, has changed in the last ten years. In fact, I would say, good luck finding ANY "fair" products.)[/quote]
Yes, I realize that as I wrote; however, I think there's a broad line here. The vast majority of staple products have undergone package shrink in recent years, but the price has remained the same or increased, not decreased. A 1999-era half gallon of ice cream is comparable to a 2009- 48 or 56 ounce container today.
Some products improve and/or transform over time, and it's exactly those products that should not be used for this game. "Now & Then" should be played with the most "regular vanilla" products in the grocery store. Regular Pam cooking spray, regular Bounty paper towels, regular Arm & Hammer baking soda. Not Light Pam with olive oil flavor, Select-a-size Bounty paper towels with flowers and teddy bears on them, or Arm & Hammer refrigerator freshener disc things.
My fear is that the staff are picking random items from their inventory and applying rough inflation calculations to the prices to obtain the "then" levels, which is unfair in the very least. And if that's how the game has worked from the beginning, so be it, but I don't think this is true.