Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: password and contractions  (Read 2518 times)

toetyper

  • Member
  • Posts: 317
password and contractions
« on: December 06, 2009, 12:21:10 PM »
are names like o'reilly and o'hare considered contractions and therefore are illegal clues

Jimmy Owen

  • Member
  • Posts: 7629
password and contractions
« Reply #1 on: December 06, 2009, 12:52:32 PM »
Not sure, but I'd use other clues instead. "Hannity" for blowhard and "LaGuardia" for airport.
« Last Edit: December 06, 2009, 12:56:50 PM by Jimmy Owen »
Let's Make a Deal was the first show to air on Buzzr. 6/1/15 8PM.

TLEberle

  • Member
  • Posts: 15667
  • Rules Constable
password and contractions
« Reply #2 on: December 06, 2009, 01:38:33 PM »
[quote name=\'toetyper\' post=\'231699\' date=\'Dec 6 2009, 09:21 AM\']are names like o'reilly and o'hare considered contractions and therefore are illegal clues[/quote]"O'Reilly" is not 'considered' a contraction, it is a contraction. Contractions are not disallowed as passwords, only hyphenated words are disallowed specifically.
Travis L. Eberle

chad1m

  • Member
  • Posts: 2869
password and contractions
« Reply #3 on: December 06, 2009, 02:06:55 PM »
Let me whip out my MDP rule guide, it's cut and dry: 5.  Passwords and clues may both contain apostrophes (examples: “won't”, “O'Connor”).

jmangin

  • Member
  • Posts: 554
password and contractions
« Reply #4 on: December 06, 2009, 04:58:46 PM »
[quote name=\'TLEberle\' post=\'231704\' date=\'Dec 6 2009, 01:38 PM\']"O'Reilly" is not 'considered' a contraction, it is a contraction.[/quote]
"O'Reilly" is not a contraction--it's a last name with an apostrophe in it just as some last names have accent marks. The apostrophe is not a grammatical mark denoting the omission of letters, nor does it join two words together.

Jimmy Owen

  • Member
  • Posts: 7629
password and contractions
« Reply #5 on: December 06, 2009, 05:02:15 PM »
[quote name=\'jmangin\' post=\'231714\' date=\'Dec 6 2009, 04:58 PM\'][quote name=\'TLEberle\' post=\'231704\' date=\'Dec 6 2009, 01:38 PM\']"O'Reilly" is not 'considered' a contraction, it is a contraction.[/quote]
"O'Reilly" is not a contraction--it's a last name with an apostrophe in it just as some last names have accent marks. The apostrophe is not a grammatical mark denoting the omission of letters, nor does it join two words together.
[/quote]
I thought it meant "Of Reilly" to indicate son of or some sort of relation.  Sort of like Mc for the Scots and D' in Italian.
« Last Edit: December 06, 2009, 05:09:34 PM by Jimmy Owen »
Let's Make a Deal was the first show to air on Buzzr. 6/1/15 8PM.

jmangin

  • Member
  • Posts: 554
password and contractions
« Reply #6 on: December 06, 2009, 05:22:25 PM »
[quote name=\'Jimmy Owen\' post=\'231715\' date=\'Dec 6 2009, 05:02 PM\']I thought it meant "Of Reilly" to indicate son of or some sort of relation.  Sort of like Mc for the Scots and D' in Italian.[/quote]
Yes, the O' denotes decedents of an ancestor, but does not necessarily contract the word "of" with a surname, just as Mc isn't a shortened word. O'Reilly isn't a contraction. Can't and doesn't are.

Neumms

  • Member
  • Posts: 2397
password and contractions
« Reply #7 on: December 06, 2009, 05:26:07 PM »
On what Regis calls "Classic Password," I was surprised recently to hear "don't" as an acceptable clue, so they do take contractions. As you say, Allen never said they're illegal.

TLEberle

  • Member
  • Posts: 15667
  • Rules Constable
password and contractions
« Reply #8 on: December 06, 2009, 06:57:27 PM »
[quote name=\'jmangin\' post=\'231714\' date=\'Dec 6 2009, 01:58 PM\']The apostrophe is not a grammatical mark denoting the omission of letters, nor does it join two words together.[/quote]Which is just pure baloney. All of it. Both of these clauses are outright falsehoods.
Travis L. Eberle

Matt Ottinger

  • Member
  • Posts: 12916
password and contractions
« Reply #9 on: December 06, 2009, 07:27:43 PM »
[quote name=\'TLEberle\' post=\'231722\' date=\'Dec 6 2009, 06:57 PM\'][quote name=\'jmangin\' post=\'231714\' date=\'Dec 6 2009, 01:58 PM\']The apostrophe is not a grammatical mark denoting the omission of letters, nor does it join two words together.[/quote]Which is just pure baloney. All of it. Both of these clauses are outright falsehoods.[/quote]
No, in the context of his example, the apostrophe in the name O'Reilly does not denote the omission of letters, nor does it join two words together.  Bill's (hey, look, another apostrophe!) last name is not "Of Reilly"  The fact that the apostrophe in this case at one time represented the absence of letters is certainly an interesting etymological point, but the name "O'Reilly" certainly isn't (look, another one!) a contraction.
This has been another installment of Matt Ottinger's Masters of the Obvious.
Stay tuned for all the obsessive-compulsive fun of Words Have Meanings.