[quote name=\'fostergray82\' post=\'240765\' date=\'May 12 2010, 09:05 PM\']Nowadays, I don't know what I'll get at 11am. That can be a good thing at times...if I'm judging for Emmy-worthy material, I'm not so sure.
TPiR's outside-the-box thinking has gotten a couple of laughs out of me. However, if the production is still all over the place, I'm crossing it off my ballot list.[/quote]
I have to applaud you Brandon for bringing that rare-but-welcome TPIR opinion - that the show is still doing things right, while having room for improvement. There's a certain cluster of people almost too quick to praise the new show any time they do something different. Namely, if you were tired of Barker and/or the line-up of fans at G-R or something, then you're more likely to come on here and tell us how much you love their latest set or rule change, calling it an interesting breath of fresh air.
I can find fault and praise for both eras of the show. But if we're all watching the same thing, I'm frankly surprised at the reaction sometimes. I too appreciate the newness of it, but they've done some misguided things in the process. I think it might be interesting (perhaps elsewhere, so not to derail this thread) to see some of the people who champion either side share their dislike for the show they favor, and give praise to the era they don't. (In my case, I'd say the prizes were almost embarrassingly stagnant in the Barker years, and I like the new home base introduced this season.)
-Jason