[quote name=\'TimK2003\' post=\'246703\' date=\'Sep 2 2010, 12:33 PM\']I just used MG as an example of some of the games that are considered no-lose games.[/quote] I would say that if you ask someone who just "won" a hundred and twelve dollars at Money Game, or the piggy bank in Any Number, if they thought they lost, they're gonna say yes.
I am just not in favor of games that could guarantee you enough money right up front so, when paired with your IUFB, you can slide into the 3rd slot on the Big Wheel or the 1st slot in the Showcase simply by default when up to 5 other players have to take risks or have to beat odds to try to earn those same positions.
Huh? What if everyone wins their game? Someone still has to spin first. Can someone find some evidence to support the thing about the consolation money moving somebody up in the order?
[quote name=\'JasonA1\' post=\'246709\' date=\'Sep 2 2010, 01:58 PM\']Part of an argument Matt has been bringing up with regard to the new direction of Price deals with whether you consider the show a serious test of pricing skill, or a fun collection of guessing games. I don't so much fall in either camp,[/quote]I don't think you can, really. (OK, I guess you could be all Serious Business, or Happy Fun Time over it, but you oughtn't.) There's also the show that we see on the screen, and the show that happens in the preparation, and the back end that most people don't know about. I think that the way things oughta be is that you put a great deal of effort into a final product where everyone is having fun, winning stuff and the atmosphere is frenetic and happy.