The point- which you're missing- is that there is a simple solution to the problem that if one looked for it,
I get the point. But I think my point supersedes that point, being "just put the information in the proper location and no one has to look for anything in the first place."
I don't agree, although your point is valid. The information in this case, IMO, was easy enough to find. But to each his own.
my attitude may not always be pleasant but yours isn't exactly sunshine, lollipops, and rainbows either.
Yes, but I don't think Mark has ever publicly declared to be trying to turn things around and then contacted someone who has criticized his "changed ways" in public when they appear to be patterning the same things we've seen before.
Well, when I have people like you and Mark constantly watching my posts waiting for the slightest thing that might set you off and point and say "look look look same old crap", it kind of defeats the purpose, doesn't it?
I mean, I don't understand a couple of things. The point should have simply ended with "full version". And it DEFINITELY should have ended when the dude of pac set everyone who wasn't straight straight. (That doesn't sound right, I know.) And I also don't understand why this was made into such a big deal- was it just because I said it?
Maybe we all (especially me) just need to breathe a bit. (I seriously didn't think my comments were going to cause THAT much of a stir, especially considering how easy things could have been found- and I'll keep hammering that point home, sorry.)
ETA: Okay, I didn't see that thread. But these are going to be my last comments on the issue so I'm sticking them here. Because the last thing I want to do is continue this any further than it's already gone.