Am I correct in saying that Bonkers, Race Game, and Clock Game would be the only pricing games that even with no knowledge of prices, are guaranteed wins just by using process of elimination logic?
I question whether you could do enough checks for either Bonkers or Race Game.
Bonkers? Definitely not. But Race gives you an additional 15 seconds AND you have the luxury of knowing how many are right.
In Race Game (and correct me if I'm wrong), you just need to have one right to get somewhere:
When you have one right, make switches, pulling the lever after each (and at most, it should take two) to get to two right.
Once you have two right, make one tag swap and pull the lever. If it goes back down to 1, switch those tags back and make a different tag swap. Do this until you have 4...or zero, in which case it becomes obvious what the right combo is. It's a lot less complicated than I make it sound.
If retired games count, you'd win Professor Price if you got all three general knowledge questions right, regardless of whether or not you got the two "Is this number in the price of the car?" questions.
(sigh) Games won by logic and deduction. Assume this person playing these games has never seen the show, and only knows the rules based on host explanation. What games could they guarantee themselves a win in?
No general knowledge questions. (Professor Price)
No physical requirements. (Super Ball, On The Spot, Hole In One)
No prior knowledge of show tendencies. (Ten Chances, Cliff Hangers)
No "I did nothing right in the first half, yet backed into a victory" games. (Let Em Roll, Pass The Buck, Hole In One, etc.)
