Looking over that poor contestant who got the big donut playing Plinko, I'm reminded of two times that I rooted against the contestants, both times on TPiR:
Either last month, or close, a woman in Contestant's Row makes an incredibly dumb bid (that narrows down the field how much?), is generally not paying attention to the game, and so forth, but miraculously makes it onstage to play Plinko. ("Damn it all, you stupid woman; why on earth are you onstage?") Imagine my disgust that such a good game is wasted on her. I hope for the worst, and damn near get it: three chips and $600 is all she gets. She's bounced in the Showcase Showdown and all is right with the world.
Last year, more TPiR ineptitude abounds, two college age yokels make it on stage, completely botch their respective games, and luck into the Showcase. I say, "you know, I can't stand either of you. I hope you both go over." Ta-da, double overbid, Bob exits through the audience. And it was an atrocious double-over, at that. Not even close.
I know it's not very nice to hope that contestants lose, but sometimes people on that show really irritate me. Am I the only one that thinks that the viewing audience might enjoy watching people who know what the hell they're doing onstage rather than the Cross-Section of America thing the coordinators are doing now? And I don't mean knowing the secrets of the games like us, I mean not making dumb choices, like underbidding by $1 in Contestant's Row, being able to play the games properly, and making the Showcase a reasonably exciting final act.
Commence to discussion.
Travis