GSN, this is a new low, even for you (PYL and CS related)

[tvwxman]

A lot of the stuff you just read was stuff that I wrote that I am now officially, deeply sorry for, and humiliated by.

Good. Now post less, and read more.

[BrandonFG]

A lot of the stuff you just read was stuff that I wrote that I am now officially, deeply sorry for, and humiliated by.

I'm willing to accept that...as long as you're not saying that to get off the hook. Just remember that a lot of us here have long memories.

[Vahan_Nisanian]

BTW, Brandon, I have something else that I'd like to address to you as well. But I prefer to tell you about via email as opposed to profile feed.

I don't like the fact that the new version of this forum took away the email option.

[NickS]

I'm going to take the Abell approach here and say that the Card Sharks/Press Your Luck leases costed $7.95 each.

If the leaser is offering $7.95 for each property, then I'll take both and find it time where I work at.

/OH YOU MEANT PER EPISODE
//I think you're taking the wrong approach
///I like where this thread is-- oh, it's already there

[J.R.]

A lot of the stuff you just read was stuff that I wrote that I am now officially, deeply sorry for, and humiliated by.

No offense, but you're gonna have to prove it with by "walking the walk" this time. Next time you throw a hissy fit over GSN's decisions or have a public meltdown over a critical post and you'll render this apology hollow.

For now: I'm willing to let it go. Preform your end of the bargain and all will be well.

[TLEberle]

I'm willing to accept that...as long as you're not saying that to get off the hook. Just remember that a lot of us here have long memories.

Did anybody as a youth mean it when you said "I'm sorry"? Cuz this sounds "I'm sorry I said some stupid stuff and made myself out to be an enormous toolbag."

[Johnissoevil]

I myself am going to give you a chance, GSLover87, that's all I'm going to say.  Raygor and BFG said all that needed to be said.

[PYLdude]

As for me, I'm going to take the apology with a huge pile of salt.

GSL may claim he's changed, but it's only going to be a matter of time before he says something that's either a) utterly offensive, or b) nonsensical.

[NickS]

We know it's not that cheap, but you're gotta admit a 200-episode lease of any pre-1990 show on the GSN schedule now is pretty dirt cheap because no other networks want them.

So is it "not that cheap" or is it "pretty dirt cheap?"

Pick a lane.

I love when people are deluded enough that a per-show cost is under $10 for a national network.

[clemon79]

We know it's not that cheap, but you're gotta admit a 200-episode lease of any pre-1990 show on the GSN schedule now is pretty dirt cheap because no other networks want them.

I admit no such thing because I, just like you, not only don't know what the lease would cost, but even further don't know how that number compares to similarly-aged programming. And even further than THAT, I couldn't say how those numbers fit into GSN's finances.

And until YOU can cite those numbers, you need to stop talking out of your ass.

[Dbacksfan12]

We know it's not that cheap, but you're gotta admit a 200-episode lease of any pre-1990 show on the GSN schedule now is pretty dirt cheap because no other networks want them

PonR.  Iirc ESPN classic reruns old shows on occasion.  And unless you have some definitive numbers, which I doubt, you aren't in any position to make a definitive statement.

[clemon79]

Better question

Not so much. He's not the one making complete ex-rectum proclamations, whereas we are of the opinion that you are. The burden of proof is on you to dispute that.

[NickS]

Better question: Do you?

Uh, I think control is still on your side since you never answered his - nor mine to pick a lane - for that matter.

So, like Mark is asking, what qualifications do you have to make these claims about what GSN is paying for them?

[TLEberle]

Better question: Do you?

Did you really just cite case law from Rubber v. Glue as your answer? Cuz it doesn't work like that.

[irwinsjournal.com]

Did you really just cite case law from Rubber v. Glue as your answer? Cuz it doesn't work like that.

I have not stopped laughing at this one yet.  Serves me right for trying to eat lunch while reading these threads.