[quote name=\'tvrandywest\' date=\'Dec 18 2003, 10:56 PM\'] [quote name=\'isucgv\' date=\'Dec 18 2003, 07:28 PM\'] I'd love to hear from Randy West on this [/quote]
Your Christmas wish is granted ;-)
"Price" is "the main room". There is no more demanding show for an announcer. As such, Roger and company know they are working with pros and are wonderfully respectful in affording the announcer the freedom and latitude to ad-lib the cues to and from Bob. But it comes with a bit of danger!
While the challenge of thinking on your feet when responding to Bob's throws is the best part of the job, it's tough sometimes. You want to keep the conversational style, yet still need to be true to the intent of the copy. It's tougher than it sounds because there are responses that might sound more conversational but have potential legal implications.
In the example you cite there is a risk in simply responding with a line that includes "$16,000" without including the phrase "a chance to win". You could argue that Bob already made the legal distinction by saying "
can win", but in general there's a danger in trying to shortcut the copy when there are legalities involved. Having been in that exact situation myself, I'm certain that's why Burton used the scripted copy rather than fashioning a more conversational response that could have proven troublesome.
I've had a few awkward transitions when Bob says "What is this Randy?" and the copy starts with something like "Enjoy the fresh taste of home made iced tea wherever you go...."!
I love it! ;-)
Randy
tvrandywest.com [/quote]
How far can legalities get with something like that?? Is it an issue of constants suing? Isn't there a waver associated with that?? Do I have any more questions???
Well, yes, actually. There was a discussion on one of the forums awhile back about Bob cutting in in the middle of the announcer's Come on Down spiel. Does it bug you if Bob does that, Randy?
T
www.46664.comvisit the website
make the call
give one minute of your life