Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Yet another DWTS marathon  (Read 13880 times)

BillCullen1

  • Member
  • Posts: 3399
Yet another DWTS marathon
« on: January 31, 2013, 12:29:26 AM »

I guess GSN figures they\'ve got nothing to lose against the Super Bowl. Per a promo on GSN, the marathon will start on Sunday, 2/3 at 5 pm EST.



JMFabiano

  • Member
  • Posts: 1549
Yet another DWTS marathon
« Reply #1 on: January 31, 2013, 12:44:17 PM »

Just like with Beat the Chefs, they\'re going to keep going back to something until it works, won\'t they?


I'm a pacifist, and even I would like to see a little more action.

J.R.

  • Member
  • Posts: 3901
Yet another DWTS marathon
« Reply #2 on: January 31, 2013, 07:56:37 PM »
More crap GSN news: Family Trade has been pushed back the week to March 12th. 

 


I\'d rather get the series over with as soon as possible. 


Who is forcing you to watch GSN?


-Joe Raygor

dale_grass

  • Member
  • Posts: 1382
Yet another DWTS marathon
« Reply #3 on: February 03, 2013, 01:28:55 PM »
I\'ll be watching CBS, of course.

Naturally.


Dbacksfan12

  • Member
  • Posts: 6216
  • Just leave the set; that’d be terrific.
Yet another DWTS marathon
« Reply #4 on: February 04, 2013, 08:16:28 AM »
I didn\'t know people in LGY\'S demographic liked \"Elementary\".
--Mark
Phil 4:13

dale_grass

  • Member
  • Posts: 1382
Yet another DWTS marathon
« Reply #5 on: February 04, 2013, 01:49:39 PM »
I didn\'t know people in LGY\'S demographic liked \"Elementary\".

Please.  Third grade was the best two years of his life.


TLEberle

  • Member
  • Posts: 15952
  • Rules Constable
Yet another DWTS marathon
« Reply #6 on: February 08, 2013, 06:36:17 PM »
Why is this newsworthy: tertiary cable net pulls hash marks against Sportsball Championship (TM)?
If you didn’t create it, it isn’t your content.

clemon79

  • Member
  • Posts: 27693
  • Director of Suck Consolidation
Yet another DWTS marathon
« Reply #7 on: February 08, 2013, 07:57:38 PM »
Why is this newsworthy: tertiary cable net pulls hash marks against Sportsball Championship (TM)?
God, no kidding. Talk about cherrypicking...that insight\'s worthless even by LGY standards.

Not that his credibility wasn\'t shot before, mind you.
Chris Lemon, King Fool, Director of Suck Consolidation
http://fredsmythe.com
Email: clemon79@outlook.com  |  Skype: FredSmythe

TLEberle

  • Member
  • Posts: 15952
  • Rules Constable
Yet another DWTS marathon
« Reply #8 on: February 08, 2013, 08:17:53 PM »
You thought wrongly, grasshopper. Just because you want to say it doesn\'t mean we want to hear it.
« Last Edit: February 08, 2013, 08:22:09 PM by TLEberle »
If you didn’t create it, it isn’t your content.

Matt Ottinger

  • Member
  • Posts: 13014
Yet another DWTS marathon
« Reply #9 on: February 08, 2013, 08:52:32 PM »
The reason is since I got this in my mailbox....

 


Quote


Have ratings for the Dancing with the Stars-SuperBowl marathon?


I went to the SonoftheBronx site and found nothing.



 


Which I figure you could have responded to by e-mail as well.

This has been another installment of Matt Ottinger's Masters of the Obvious.
Stay tuned for all the obsessive-compulsive fun of Words Have Meanings.

PYLdude

  • Member
  • Posts: 8270
  • Still crazy after all these years.
Yet another DWTS marathon
« Reply #10 on: February 08, 2013, 09:25:27 PM »

The follow up question is \"who besides Mr. Yank cares about these ratings?\"

I suppose you can still learn stuff on TLC, though it would be more in the Goofus & Gallant sense, that is (don't do what these parents did)"- Travis Eberle, 2012

“We’re game show fans. ‘Weird’ comes with the territory.” - Matt Ottinger, 2022

Steve Gavazzi

  • Member
  • Posts: 3301
Yet another DWTS marathon
« Reply #11 on: February 08, 2013, 09:26:47 PM »
The follow up question is \"who besides Mr. Yank cares about these ratings?\"

And then, \"He e-mailed himself?\" :-)

Vahan_Nisanian

  • Member
  • Posts: 1830
Yet another DWTS marathon
« Reply #12 on: February 08, 2013, 09:53:50 PM »
The follow up question is \"who besides Mr. Yank cares about these ratings?\"

 


At the risk of being whooshed...


 


Hint: His initials are C.A.


« Last Edit: February 08, 2013, 09:54:30 PM by gameshowlover87 »

clemon79

  • Member
  • Posts: 27693
  • Director of Suck Consolidation
Yet another DWTS marathon
« Reply #13 on: February 09, 2013, 01:20:08 AM »

The part that I find particularly offensive is that he isn\'t even aware that I wasn\'t calling him out for posting the numbers, I was calling him out (along with Travis) for suggesting that the ratings of something airing opposite the SUPER FARKING BOWL are IN ANY WAY statistically useful.


Chris Lemon, King Fool, Director of Suck Consolidation
http://fredsmythe.com
Email: clemon79@outlook.com  |  Skype: FredSmythe

TLEberle

  • Member
  • Posts: 15952
  • Rules Constable
Yet another DWTS marathon
« Reply #14 on: February 09, 2013, 02:29:52 AM »
Scott:

The goal of a TV network is to draw eyeballs to watch things that make them money. This is the \"content\" that networks wrap around the ads. On a day such as the Super Bowl, even GSN, all the way up at 161 on my dial, is trying to draw eyeballs. NBC did it with a special \"Fear Factor\" one year. Animal Planet does it with the Puppy Bowl. There is a group of people who couldn\'t be arsed to watch the football game (until the blackout I was one of them). GSN has two choices: contend for those eyeballs or put up a test pattern. If they figure that they can reach 100k viewers, they want to maximize their profit. Typically you do that by running the least expensive thing that will reach that benchmark. I realize that you don\'t like this because DWTS isn\'t something you want to watch, but they\'re not programming just to you, and they\'re not accountable to you: they have bills to pay and a ledger that has to add up at the end of each month.

Do you understand why nobody here takes anything you say seriously at all? That you\'re roundly met with near complete derision? That every time you annoy your keyboard and click on \"post\" you\'re just digging your hole even bigger? Does this even concern you?
If you didn’t create it, it isn’t your content.