As a devil\'s advocate moment:
I am part of the regular play testing of many of the board games that come from Houston. If you wonder why a stupid-looking rule is in a game that came from here, it\'s because either I or one of my cohorts found a loophole and beat the designer over the head with it.
While I recognize that the original question doesn\'t make sense from a \"good TV\" perspective, you\'d better believe that were I play testing Whew! as a game, I\'d try to engineer a win exactly in this manner just to see what would happen.
So I have no problem with the question. The fact that a rule had to be written in the contestant release to cover the scenario suggests that the question is, in fact, not at all silly, because they foresaw the same scenario when they wrote the game.
As to the giant slap-fight going on, whatever issues the OP has had in the past, here he asked a legitimate question, and got crapped on because of bias for past actions. Gentlemen, if you\'re having a bad day, please change your tampons and save it for when the OP does something dumb. He won\'t learn to change poor behavior if you act the same no matter what his behavior.
edit: a word