Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Brandie Cochran: Back to Square One  (Read 3872 times)

Matt Ottinger

  • Member
  • Posts: 12994
This has been another installment of Matt Ottinger's Masters of the Obvious.
Stay tuned for all the obsessive-compulsive fun of Words Have Meanings.

BrandonFG

  • Member
  • Posts: 18560
Brandie Cochran: Back to Square One
« Reply #1 on: July 25, 2013, 09:11:24 AM »

[citation needed] on just about everything you posted


"It wasn't like this on Tic Tac Dough...Wink never gave a damn!"

JonSea31

  • Member
  • Posts: 169
Brandie Cochran: Back to Square One
« Reply #2 on: July 25, 2013, 09:47:44 AM »

I edited my above post as my post was intended to be based on speculation.


 


I don\'t know the facts, yet.  When the verdict is revealed, we will know what may have really happened.  Or we may never know.


I am developing classic game show PC games.
If you'd like to find out information about them, PM me anytime.

TLEberle

  • Member
  • Posts: 15904
  • Rules Constable
Brandie Cochran: Back to Square One
« Reply #3 on: July 25, 2013, 11:20:08 AM »

I don\'t know the facts, yet.  When the verdict is revealed, we will know what may have really happened.  Or we may never know.

A thing might happen. Or it may not happen. We may never know. Gee thanks, that\'s awfully insightful of you.
If you didn’t create it, it isn’t your content.

gamed121683

  • Member
  • Posts: 841
Brandie Cochran: Back to Square One
« Reply #4 on: July 25, 2013, 11:48:37 AM »


 


 


I don\'t know the facts, yet.  When the verdict is revealed, we will know what may have really happened.  Or we may never know.




 


To put it another way, \"That post presents information based in part on theory & conjecture. The poster\'s purpose is to suggest some possible explanations, but not necessarily the only ones to the mystery that is examined.\"


TLEberle

  • Member
  • Posts: 15904
  • Rules Constable
Brandie Cochran: Back to Square One
« Reply #5 on: July 25, 2013, 11:53:43 AM »

To put it another way, \"That post presents information based in part on theory & conjecture. The poster\'s purpose is to suggest some possible explanations, but not necessarily the only ones to the mystery that is examined.\"

I think it is highly improper to try and guess what another person is thinking in cases like this; JonSea is marginally capable of telling us what he meant there.
« Last Edit: July 30, 2013, 04:28:48 PM by TLEberle »
If you didn’t create it, it isn’t your content.

clemon79

  • Member
  • Posts: 27684
  • Director of Suck Consolidation
Brandie Cochran: Back to Square One
« Reply #6 on: July 25, 2013, 12:13:15 PM »

\"That post presents information based in part on theory & conjecture.


 


You misspelled \"perceptions and beliefs.\"


 


It\'s when they get stated as fact (and I don\'t care if he fixed it after the fact; he knew better than to do it in the first place) that there\'s an issue.

Chris Lemon, King Fool, Director of Suck Consolidation
http://fredsmythe.com
Email: clemon79@outlook.com  |  Skype: FredSmythe

Steve Gavazzi

  • Member
  • Posts: 3300
Brandie Cochran: Back to Square One
« Reply #7 on: July 25, 2013, 01:57:45 PM »

when she may really have been let go maybe because of...lack of charisma...as she may have been losing it after her 2007 miscarriage.


Holy good Lord. You\'re a jackass.

TLEberle

  • Member
  • Posts: 15904
  • Rules Constable
Brandie Cochran: Back to Square One
« Reply #8 on: July 25, 2013, 02:17:59 PM »
So you\'re saying that your perception and or belief is that JonSea is a tactless jackass? Cuz if you\'re not I will.
If you didn’t create it, it isn’t your content.

JonSea31

  • Member
  • Posts: 169
Brandie Cochran: Back to Square One
« Reply #9 on: July 25, 2013, 03:28:40 PM »

Wow, I didn\'t think I would stir such controversy with my speculations. Makes me wonder if these boards are strictly for the purpose of discussing facts and not speculations without any proof to back them up?  If so, then I apologize for my problems, and I think I should only post when absolutely necessary.


 


I can see why the thread I created about The Joker\'s Wild a while ago seemed to be pretty legit.


I am developing classic game show PC games.
If you'd like to find out information about them, PM me anytime.

clemon79

  • Member
  • Posts: 27684
  • Director of Suck Consolidation
Brandie Cochran: Back to Square One
« Reply #10 on: July 25, 2013, 03:44:52 PM »


Makes me wonder if these boards are strictly for the purpose of discussing facts and not speculations without any proof to back them up?




 


Best. Ponderance. Evar.

Chris Lemon, King Fool, Director of Suck Consolidation
http://fredsmythe.com
Email: clemon79@outlook.com  |  Skype: FredSmythe

TLEberle

  • Member
  • Posts: 15904
  • Rules Constable
Brandie Cochran: Back to Square One
« Reply #11 on: July 25, 2013, 03:47:01 PM »
Of course he didn\'t. Why bother to use critical thinking skills and logic when you can spout unfounded perceptions and beliefs instead?

I\'m so disgusted with the no-longer-noob that I\'m not even going to answer his question, because the answer should be obvious.
« Last Edit: July 25, 2013, 03:48:12 PM by TLEberle »
If you didn’t create it, it isn’t your content.

BrandonFG

  • Member
  • Posts: 18560
Brandie Cochran: Back to Square One
« Reply #12 on: July 25, 2013, 03:59:14 PM »


Wow, I didn\'t think I would stir such controversy with my speculations. Makes me wonder if these boards are strictly for the purpose of discussing facts and not speculations without any proof to back them up?  If so, then I apologize for my problems, and I think I should only post when absolutely necessary.




I don\'t know what you\'re getting at, but your post comes off a little passive-aggressive. There\'s nothing wrong with speculating, except when you start trying to pass it off as fact. It\'s no different than throwing your two cents into a face-to-face conversation; if you want to speculate, make it known.


 


Had you said \"In my opinion, this all happened because ___\", then offered a few examples as possible precedents, it would\'ve been a different story, so long as you noted that A  B. You tried to tie up the loose ends with your edit, but it still didn\'t tie up everything.

"It wasn't like this on Tic Tac Dough...Wink never gave a damn!"

TLEberle

  • Member
  • Posts: 15904
  • Rules Constable
Brandie Cochran: Back to Square One
« Reply #13 on: July 25, 2013, 04:14:10 PM »
Not to mention that JonSea\'s posts broadly fall afoul of #7 of the Eligibility Requirements.
If you didn’t create it, it isn’t your content.

chris319

  • Co-Executive Producer
  • Posts: 10647
Brandie Cochran: Back to Square One
« Reply #14 on: July 25, 2013, 08:31:06 PM »

When\'s the new trial going to begin?