I wonder if the people here defending Sony's actions find it fair when a company will not allow people here America to view their videos on YouTube, or another site similar to it, like Dailymotion.
If you find it fair, and don't think these companies are treating people here in America like animals, I feel bad for you.
God forbid a company would want to make money and hold on to the intellectual and property rights to their property. I mean, it's not like they're trying to make money anything; they'll just say, "Okay, go ahead, you have this and keep it online, no restrictions! We don't need this money anyway, it's not like our shareholders will care about this at all."
Honestly, though, every time I think you can't stoop lower than you do about property rights of companies keeping their own material, you do. It's no surprise, but the manner in which you do so reeks of ignorance with respect to how and why companies exist. They do not exist to please you. They exist to help increase shareholder profits. If what a company does, creates, etc. pleases you, that is just an additional bonus.
How many times has the Forum explained these concepts to you? Don't answer that. By extension, it's the same number as times your promulgations have been filled with petulant puling.
/A person shouldn't be this pale, Zach
//Hor today, an' gone tomorrow
