I don't know if this is too much of a "dream scenario" than a realistic option, depending on how much time/effort/cost Fremantle would put into this...but with the modern-day "morphing" of TV viewing options (on-demand services, subscription-based channels, streaming devices, etc.), why wouldn't Fremantle consider developing:
1) a streaming channel for well-known platforms...Roku, Apple TV, etc. (maybe even their website) - if it's "free" on OTA TV, why not deliver the same service via online-accessible platforms? That would be a reasonable execution of a larger-scale rollout.
2) a subscription-based option for video-on-demand content, through the same above-mentioned platforms (possibly offer a live stream of the channel, and supplement subscribers with a VOD feature)
Certainly there's enough content to rotate VOD offerings / maybe offer options that are exclusive to VOD & broadcast completely different exclusive offerings through the regular live channel...it would allow subscribers to have a broader spectrum of live & VOD offerings, while allowing non-subscribers to enjoy the live channel programs (keeping in mind, program offerings would change over time)
The company itself certainly has the resources to do it. Question is, would it even be considered (to any degree as mentioned above) or is it too "far-fetched"/felt it wouldn't be worth the effort?