Sometimes the fun, for me at least, is getting into weeds that are frankly impractical.
And that is, more or less, the approach from which I made my comment about the nametag font. If it I didn't couple it with enough
he hes or self-deprecating humour to highlight it was something that I happened to notice and remarked about from a, "Yeah, we would be the kind of people to notice such a detail, wouldn't we?" perspective, then I'll remember that the next time I attempt to make a remark in jest. I think the other comments I have made on the subject at hand in this thread have clearly shown an overall positive attitude towards it and certainly not worthy of the invective I have received.
In fairness, I think there’s a marked difference between “I wish they would refine the Punchboard matrix” versus someone commenting on whether or not a font is 100% accurate in a movie adaptation.
The first invites discussion. The second (rightfully so, IMO) directs invective towards that individual poster.
And IMO, that's where you're wrong.
Disagreement is one thing. Invective is another. The first is a healthy part of discussion. The second is not.