[quote name=\'Craig Karlberg\' date=\'Mar 31 2004, 06:16 AM\'] In the first couple of seasons of Alex's show, contestants can ring in anytime before he could finish the clue, but that prooved to be disadvantagious for the "slower" players who were trying to figure out the clue. [/quote]
Carlo was certainly in a better position than any of us to know the real reason why they changed the rule. Still, I thought that even in that first season, Alex would finish reading the clue anyway, so how did the change help the director?
I seem to recall reading in Harry Eisenberg's book that a reason for the change was because it reduced the number of wrong responses and the number of delays waiting for responses that never came. Good players often would ring in right away, assuming they'd be able to come up with the correct response even before they'd seen the clue. Great players like Chuck Forrest were able to make that gamble pay off. Still, on those times when the gamble didn't pay off we'd be left with awkward "I don't know" moments, moments that were dramatically reduced when the players got to hear the entire clue before deciding whether to signal.
At no point did I EVER hear that they made the change to help "slower" players, which strikes me as being against anything Jeopardy would ever try to do.