[quote name=\'TimK2003\' date=\'May 12 2004, 08:26 PM\'][quote name=\'uncamark\' date=\'May 10 2004, 11:39 AM\'] The fact that "Good Day Live!" is in syndication rather than being on the network is proof that the affils don't want a show crammed down their throats in daytime. [/quote]
I thought that GDL was indeed a FOX Network show along with Live w/ Ryan Secrest? Then what percentage of the local FOX affiliates carry it?
[/quote]
Technically, both "GDL" and "On Air" are syndicated series distributed by Fox subsid 20th Television and airing on Fox-owned stations, so it's understandable that you'd think that they were Fox *network* projects (the fact that they cross-plug Fox a lot would also lead you to think that they were network), but they aren't. The station list on the "GDL" web site doesn't indicate network affiliation, but with the exception of Viacom-owned UPN affil KBHK in San Francisco, most of the call letters I recognize on the list are either Fox affils or Fox-owned UPN affils in Fox-owned duopoly markets. Since "On Air" doesn't have one complete station list on its site, the states I looked at look like the same thing (complete with KBHK carrying the show in the Bay Area). The difference, of course, is that 20th only takes four minutes an hour or so of national ads on each show--if it was network, Fox would probably want a higher percentage of national ads.
I don't believe that GDL is pulling in any eye opening numbers, so might FOX might be testing WtB for a possible replacement for at least half of the afternoon gabfest?
Despite its atrocious total household numbers, it is showing growth in key demos, so 20th is willing to hang on with it for a while--besides, all of the talent and I assume most of the staff all work on "Good Day LA" and so they're not spending that much extra for the national show.
And with all due respect, I'm not going to complain one bit about a broadcast network considering a studio game show for prime time placement. Not one bit.