[quote name=\'clemon79\' date=\'May 24 2004, 06:45 PM\'][quote name=\'uncamark\' date=\'May 24 2004, 03:27 PM\'] Some people see that as stupidity because they don't get the other part of the game--the part of risking their score to earn more. [/quote]
At the same time, I would think most intelligent viewers can tell the different between a player who is spinning to milk the puzzle, and spinning because they just plain don't know it yet. Most times it's pretty obvious.[/quote]
Point well taken--and I will readily agree that the current contestant bookers on "Wheel" seem to take personality more into account than game playing ability.
Back when I tried out for the show in 1982, I overdid the enthusiasm thing really noticeably and that's why I think I didn't get chosen to go on (although now-disgraced journalist Bob Greene did choose me to take part in a group interview for his Esquire column--I'm now surprised since I wasn't a teenage girl [
]). Seemed to me in retrospect that back then they were going for something in enthusiasm between a "J!" contestant and some of the hyper players they booked back when they started on network in the Lin Bolen days.
To describe how it went (and this was back in the beginning of out-of-town contestant searches), after the written test Tony Pandolfo went up to a blackboard, made some marks and then went around the room and played the game, using a riiiiiiiggggged wheel (as in easily stopped) to see people's reactions on hitting a Bankrupt and such. In many ways, one of the more entertaining tryouts I've been to, since everyone got to actively play the game for a little bit. After they went around the room a few times, they then picked the people for a personality interview, which I lost out on. Oh well.