[quote name=\'Timsterino\' date=\'Jun 21 2004, 10:53 AM\'][quote name=\'hmtriplecrown\' date=\'Jun 21 2004, 01:25 PM\'] I missed the marathon on Saturday night. Who won the extra $10K? Say it was our good friend Steve... [/quote]
It wasn't. However, Steve still made an impressive showing. Steve had the highest score on the pre-qualifying exam and earned a spot in the finals. The format left a lot to be desired. It was a random placing format with the winner of the first round playing the seed in the second round, etc. Someone had a very lucky random slot in the final round and she was the one who won.
The format was not very well thought out but Steve advises that this was because one of the contestants could not make it.
I am sure Steve will have more to say on the event.
Tim :-)[/quote]
Actually I had the *lowest* score on the pre-qualifying test, which consisted of seven numerically-answered questions (height in feet of Mt. McKinley and amount of "money" included in each standard Monopoly set were two of the three I got exactly right). Difference from each question was totaled, and I came out on top...er...on the bottom.
The format originally was to consist of eleven players (the ten tour winners and an online sweepstakes winner), but was changed to ten when Greg from Dallas couldn't make it (feeble excuse: having a baby). :-p Originally, there was supposed to be one numerical qualifying question, and the participants were to be seeded one to eleven based on their distance from the correct answer. Then, on the air, 11 was to play 10, the winner to play 9, and so on, until the winner of the ninth game faced the one seed for the ten grand.
When we arrived at Le Meridien, we were given a modified rule sheet that said there would only be nine rounds, seeds would be determined at random, and the person who scored best on a qualifying test would be awarded a third spot in the final.
Not a great format, not as good as the one mentioned above, but a heck of a lot better than the one they were toying around with early on (pure random seeding, no skill element whatsoever). All in all, the player who performed best had a legitimate shot at the ten grand, and I was beaten to the buzzer by a couple tenths of a second on the last question (which facts may or may not be related).