Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Mark Goodson Productions  (Read 6488 times)

mystery7

  • Member
  • Posts: 760
Mark Goodson Productions
« Reply #15 on: November 11, 2004, 05:23:21 PM »
Sony was guilty of every one of those transgressions plus hyperactive directing. Cutting to a different camera every 3 seconds does not necessarily make a show any faster-paced. In Pyramid's case it confused the hell out of me. In the Winner's Circle I could barely tell the celeb from the contstant to begin with, and all that cutting had me totally lost on who was who. Couldn't leave perfect enough alone, could they?
« Last Edit: November 11, 2004, 05:25:18 PM by mystery7 »

uncamark

  • Guest
Mark Goodson Productions
« Reply #16 on: November 11, 2004, 05:29:00 PM »
[quote name=\'chris319\' date=\'Nov 11 2004, 05:22 PM\']Merv didn't sell his shows to Sony. He sold them to Columbia which at the time IIRC was a division of Coca Cola Enterprises, an arm of Coca Cola the beverage manufacturer. Mark and Zach: correct me if my recollection is faulty.
[snapback]63612[/snapback]
[/quote]

Correct.

And Sony was never a candidate for taking over MGP after Goodson's death--the other names that *supposedly* were looking at the company were King World, then an independent firm, and Lorne Michaels' Broadway Video.

Sony's only other connection with MGP was that MGP was supposed to be a co-owner of GSN, but Jonathan Goodson bailed out after Mark's death (probably knowing that he was going to sell the company), while still collecting money from licensing their program library to GSN.
« Last Edit: November 11, 2004, 05:42:34 PM by chris319 »

chris319

  • Co-Executive Producer
  • Posts: 10629
Mark Goodson Productions
« Reply #17 on: November 11, 2004, 05:38:55 PM »
Quote
MGP was supposed to be a co-owner of GSN, but Jonathan Goodson bailed out after Mark's death (probably knowing that he was going to sell the company)
Jonathan was smart in not taking that risk. Licensing the library was pure upside. Being a partner in GSN involved substantial risk, but it might have greased the deal to license the library. Jonathan may also have had in mind that he would sell MGP and strike out on his own as a producer, trading on his father's name, with the late Chester Feldman on his creative team and guys like Mike Brockman and Harris Katelman around.

Skynet74

  • Guest
Mark Goodson Productions
« Reply #18 on: November 11, 2004, 05:45:41 PM »
With regard to Pyramid, Sony is guilty of every single one of these transgressions that you villify Fremantle for.
---------

 You are absolutely correct Chris.... and I have never personally cared for this version of Pyramid because of it. So I guess Fremantle is not solely responsible for tinkering with shows now that you mention it. However Sony's tinkering seems to have more success.


John

JMFabiano

  • Member
  • Posts: 1549
Mark Goodson Productions
« Reply #19 on: November 11, 2004, 10:06:06 PM »
[quote name=\'Skynet74\' date=\'Nov 11 2004, 05:45 PM\']With regard to Pyramid, Sony is guilty of every single one of these transgressions that you villify Fremantle for.
---------

 You are absolutely correct Chris.... and I have never personally cared for this version of Pyramid because of it. So I guess Fremantle is not solely responsible for tinkering with shows now that you mention it. However Sony's tinkering seems to have more success.


John
[snapback]63616[/snapback]
[/quote]

Let's do a quick analysis, shall we?  

SONY
Wheel - Pretty much the same with some updates, of course the classic days are the best though.  
Jeopardy! - Pretty much the same, moreso than WOF, actually
HS/H2 - Pretty much the same, jumped the shark with the 60 minute lightning round bonus (and the loss of Caroline, but that's just my opinion), but jumped back during the H2 era.  The "louder" complaint given by people such as Peter Marshall himself should be considered too.  
Pyramid - Same game/structure, but too many jarring changes, including the apparent hiring of simians for the judging; of the players, pushing the celebs more than the contestants (outside of gameplay, did we hear from them for more than 30 seconds?!!?); watered down game (somehow the challenge and excitement were gone); stupid subject names and subjects in themselves; and soulless set and music.  John Davidson can rest easy, as his isn't the all time low point of Pyramid history.  Aside from the host and cosmetic front game changes, it was still the '80s era Pyramid we all know and love.  
Newlywed Game - 1996 revamp should have been called N.GINO (I take it you're familiar by now with the -INO suffix?)  Better from 1997 on with Eubanks' return, until the end of series set changes, which seemed weird.  Decent revival which won't have as much respect because of GSN's post-Dark Period, pre-some time before the name change NG overdosing.  Even for this version, which didn't have as many eps. in the can.
Dating Game - Same thing...1996 = D.GINO, 1997 = better.  

FREMANTLE (PEARSON)
Match Game - Basic game, but the rest was just done wrong.  Kind of had the FF94 syndrome, as the reduction of the panel, the game (want a contained MG?  Look at MGPM's glory days of 3 rounds, people!), and yes, the prizes too.  (Insert Mo' Money comment here)  Stars were nowhere as good, and too many questions that should have just read, "Please, please, please, use the word 'penis' to fill in this BLANK!"  
Family Feud '99-'02 - A little better, but still seemed more routine and predictable than the glory days.  Louie really wasn't all that great either, of course.  I have also since come to realize, like many others, the evils of the 1-1-1-3 format.  
Family Feud current - Look and feel is much better, they eventually fixed the round problem and added returning champions too.  Richard K. isn't the best, but acceptable.  Also has the "H2 Loud" syndrome, apparently, especially when they DOUBLE THE POINTS!!!!  
100 Mexicanos Dijeron - I realize that Fremantle's only involvement here is giving Televisa the format.  But I still must mention it as the REAL way FF should have been updated.  
To Tell The Truth - Same show and format, but certain stars who put themselves over game play and purists' disdain over the challengers' topics hurt it.
CaSINO - I refuse to call it by the name of the show it was intended to be a revival of.  Need I say more???????
Whammy! - A lot of what was wrong with it can probably be blamed on Mo' Money Syndrome, actually.  2nd season was better...still it didn't ever feel the same.  
The Price Is Right - I admit I don't watch it regularly...most of the quibbles, though, seem to have been around changes in Beauties, the Rod not on camera issue, not hiring Randy ;-), and the "behind the scenes" stories about Bob.  At least that's what I gather.  Still a good taste of old school gaming.  

So, as far as mostly positive shows/revivals go, Sony is at 4 (I count DG and NG to be half points), and Fremantle is at 2.5 - 3.5 (Whammy, TTTT, Karn FF get the halves here.  And it's 3.5 if you count 100MD)  Seems close, but consider that Fremantle/Pearson had more shows to consider, so I'd still say Sony is pretty much the winner.
I'm a pacifist, and even I would like to see a little more action.

chris319

  • Co-Executive Producer
  • Posts: 10629
Mark Goodson Productions
« Reply #20 on: November 12, 2004, 12:49:49 AM »
Goodson achieved his success in large part by having talented people in the company. Those talented people, and various people who learned from them, are out of the business (or are working on TPIR Live). What is left is a mere shell of the former company, run by people who mount efforts such as Card Sharks 2001 and who killed Match Game '98 through corporate micromanagement.
« Last Edit: November 12, 2004, 12:50:48 AM by chris319 »

Ian Wallis

  • Member
  • Posts: 3793
Mark Goodson Productions
« Reply #21 on: November 12, 2004, 08:57:28 AM »
Quote
In the Winner's Circle I could barely tell the celeb from the contstant to begin with, and all that cutting had me totally lost on who was who. Couldn't leave perfect enough alone, could they?


I didn't like the fast cutting between shots either, and it bugged me that the camera for the Winner's Circle was in the opposite position than it was on all the Clark versions of the show.  We got so used to seeing (usually) the celebrity on the right hand side of the screen, and the contestant on the left, that I never did fullly get used to the way the Osmond version was shot.
For more information about Game Shows and TV Guide Magazine, click here:
https://gamesandclassictv.neocities.org/
NEW LOCATION!!!

Ian Wallis

  • Member
  • Posts: 3793
Mark Goodson Productions
« Reply #22 on: November 12, 2004, 09:00:06 AM »
Quote
Jonathan was smart in not taking that risk. Licensing the library was pure upside. Being a partner in GSN involved substantial risk, but it might have greased the deal to license the library.


Good point.  However, one wonders what state GSN would be in now had Goodson stayed in as a partner.  Would it be on more cable systems?  Would it have taken as long to build an audience?  Would their schedule still be mostly "classic" game shows?  Would it have gone in the direction it's now going in?

I know we can never know the actual answers, but it's interesting to speculate.
For more information about Game Shows and TV Guide Magazine, click here:
https://gamesandclassictv.neocities.org/
NEW LOCATION!!!

chris319

  • Co-Executive Producer
  • Posts: 10629
Mark Goodson Productions
« Reply #23 on: November 12, 2004, 06:28:43 PM »
Quote
one wonders what state GSN would be in now had Goodson stayed in as a partner. Would it be on more cable systems? Would it have taken as long to build an audience? Would their schedule still be mostly "classic" game shows? Would it have gone in the direction it's now going in?
All they could bring to the deal was the library and financial backing. They didn't know squat about running a cable network, so I doubt GSN's fate would have been much different. Yeah, maybe they could have provided some original programs (e.g. Forgive or Forget) which would have had a minor impact.