Throwing my 2 cents in (and getting back a nickel in change):
First, our esteemed co-moderator said:
It sounds like what you're saying is that you don't mind if someone's been on a game show before, just as long as he wasn't too successful. If it's OK for someone to be on an earlier game, I fail to see how the amount he won on that previous appearance should make any difference.
And then Leszek immediately piped in with:
They didn't know Tim's background when they picked him to be a contestant.
(For the record, the Leszek's remarks after the above line are, of course, dead flush right.)
OK, here's my beef: The guy won $1 Million plus. What more does he have to prove? That he can get lucky twice? As for the contestant wranglers not knowing his previous experience, there are two ways that could happen:
1) The contestant application doesn't require you to list it. If not this, then:
2) Tim failed to list his appearance.
(Say it with me now: (2) is highly unlikely. (1) is possible. Perhaps other auditioners can fill us in.)
Maybe if the original contestant qualification process was still being used, it wouldn't hurt so much. Frankly, if I had been the contestant wrangler and saw his form, I would have dropped him unless the rest of the pool was so bad, I didn't have a choice.
Go ahead, call me bitter. You'll only be stating the obvious.