[quote name=\'CaseyAbell\' date=\'Dec 26 2004, 07:35 PM\']
Henny Backus isn't a well-known enough name for GSN to disrupt their regular programming schedule to do a tribute week for.
But Jim Backus is a well-known enough name, and he would obviously be appearing with her.
[snapback]68719[/snapback]
[/quote]
You're missing the point. If (heaven forbid) Jamie Farr's wife were to pass next week, does that justify GSN dusting off episodes of TT with the Farrs to show?
Imagine the conversation:
PROGRAMMER: Hey, Chief. I need a week of TATTLETALES episodes.
PRESIDENT: For what?
PROGRAMMER: Joy Farr, the wife of Jamie, just died.
PRESIDENT: Sorry to hear that. But why do you need the episodes?
PROGRAMMER: Shouldn't we do a tribute?
PRESIDENT: Most of America doesn't know who she is. No one's going to care. Sure it'd be a nice gesture, but are we going to get more viewers because we're doing this?
PROGRAMMER: True, but most of America knows who Jamie Farr is.
PRESIDENT: You want me to clear a week of TT episodes featuring Jamie Farr and Joy Farr as a tribute to Joy just because we all know Jamie Farr? Johnson, are you crazy? Next, you'll be telling me that we should pay tribute to the widow of Jim Backus--whatever her name was. . .
Then you start delving into doing tributes for Donald Ross (Patti Deutsch's husband), Alan Hamill (Suzanne Somers' husband), and so on. At what point do you draw the line?
The point is--a tribute to the person who died should be to the person who died, not to the person who died who happened to have a spouse with a lot more notoriety.
Doug