Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: "Ultimate Jeopardy"  (Read 30293 times)

sshuffield70

  • Member
  • Posts: 1527
"Ultimate Jeopardy"
« Reply #90 on: January 02, 2005, 02:17:24 PM »
[quote name=\'Don Howard\' date=\'Jan 2 2005, 10:16 AM\'][quote name=\'Lemonjello\' date=\'Jan 2 2005, 02:28 AM\']Maybe they could do a Survivor-like ending. Tape everything up until Final Jeopardy, but then keep the results of FJ secret until revealing them weeks later, on a live show. Followed by a reunion, of course. :)
[snapback]69446[/snapback]
[/quote]
Bryant Gumbel could host.
[snapback]69457[/snapback]
[/quote]

Nah, just let the other J! host do it, since he's an expert at it. :) :)

BrandonFG

  • Member
  • Posts: 18599
"Ultimate Jeopardy"
« Reply #91 on: January 02, 2005, 03:12:09 PM »
[quote name=\'sshuffield70\' date=\'Jan 2 2005, 02:17 PM\'][quote name=\'Don Howard\' date=\'Jan 2 2005, 10:16 AM\'][quote name=\'Lemonjello\' date=\'Jan 2 2005, 02:28 AM\']Maybe they could do a Survivor-like ending. Tape everything up until Final Jeopardy, but then keep the results of FJ secret until revealing them weeks later, on a live show. Followed by a reunion, of course. :)
[snapback]69446[/snapback]
[/quote]
Bryant Gumbel could host.
[snapback]69457[/snapback]
[/quote]

Nah, just let the other J! host do it, since he's an expert at it. :) :)
[snapback]69466[/snapback]
[/quote]

I don't think Art Fleming's family would like us digging up his grave. Then again, I know some folks who would love to ask about his corpse hosting Jeopardy!

Two days into the year, and I've already booked a trip to Hell. Could always use a roommate.
"It wasn't like this on Tic Tac Dough...Wink never gave a damn!"

zachhoran

  • Member
  • Posts: 0
"Ultimate Jeopardy"
« Reply #92 on: January 03, 2005, 07:08:54 PM »
Our own Leszek Pawlowicz has the distinction of having never lost on Jeopardy. He was very vocal about a reunion tournament for several years, and then when J! finally did a rerun post Super J! did not get invited to the Million Dollar Masters tournament. I'm hoping J! will bring him back for this upcoming one, especially with roughly 10 times the number of people returning.

starcade

  • Guest
"Ultimate Jeopardy"
« Reply #93 on: January 03, 2005, 09:54:53 PM »
[quote name=\'OntarioQuizzer\' date=\'Dec 29 2004, 12:51 PM\'][quote name=\'TunaHead\' date=\'Dec 29 2004, 12:55 PM\']Steve's site posted it, but as we all remember, he also posted the Pyramid debacle a while back, as well as a Price blunder on MDS's not too long ago, not to mention the other small blunders. I for one, see through the bible stance that media outlets have known him by, only by the Jeopardy fiasco.
[snapback]69008[/snapback]
[/quote]

I hate to be the voice of dissention on this, but Steve's site was probably the only outlet on the continent that did not report on Ken Jennings' defeat until after it happened!

I also have the utmost confidence in Matt and Chris that had the information been false, the poster would have been dealt with seriously. So, why does Steve (or) anyone have to report it if we have our own credible sources confirming the reports?
[snapback]69015[/snapback]
[/quote]

Only because of the fact that he chose not to (with great (and somewhat deserved!) restraint and upset-ness...

The reason that a lot of people don't give Steve a lot of benefit is because they don't like the guy and are, bluntly, jealous of his success.  If they think they can do a better job, DO IT.

starcade

  • Guest
"Ultimate Jeopardy"
« Reply #94 on: January 03, 2005, 09:56:39 PM »
[quote name=\'zachhoran\' date=\'Jan 3 2005, 07:08 PM\']Our own Leszek Pawlowicz has the distinction of having never lost on Jeopardy. He was very vocal about a reunion tournament for several years, and then when J! finally did a rerun post Super J! did not get invited to the Million Dollar Masters tournament. I'm hoping J! will bring him back for this upcoming one, especially with roughly 10 times the number of people returning.
[snapback]69714[/snapback]
[/quote]

I would have to think that, if he's eligible, he's coming.  They certainly have a lot more people to involve this time.

One side question:  Anyone think they might just go with a 4-tier qualification tournament, win or you're out?

You'd be looking at 162 for that (3^4 = 81 for each of the two spots).

starcade

  • Guest
"Ultimate Jeopardy"
« Reply #95 on: January 03, 2005, 09:59:44 PM »
[quote name=\'Lemonjello\' date=\'Jan 2 2005, 02:28 AM\'][quote name=\'Don Howard\' date=\'Dec 30 2004, 01:46 PM\']That won't stop some big-mouth from blabbing. This isn't like the "Who Shot J.R.?" mystery on Dallas where you can simply shoot multiple endings. As we learned from Ken's defeat to Ms. Zerg, someone will not be able to keep his or her lip zipped.
[snapback]69177[/snapback]
[/quote]

Maybe they could do a Survivor-like ending. Tape everything up until Final Jeopardy, but then keep the results of FJ secret until revealing them weeks later, on a live show. Followed by a reunion, of course. :)
[snapback]69446[/snapback]
[/quote]

I'd have to think the final is going to have to be done with extreme secrecy.  Would not even be surprised if it WERE a live final!!  But, unless it's a secret final or a live one, there's no way we won't know the winner weeks in advance.

starcade

  • Guest
"Ultimate Jeopardy"
« Reply #96 on: January 03, 2005, 10:01:28 PM »
[quote name=\'JRaygor\' date=\'Dec 31 2004, 02:14 PM\'][quote name=\'starcade\' date=\'Dec 31 2004, 12:45 PM\']The whole idea is Ken being the ultimate goal for the rest to aspire to.

I could almost envision a revised set with Ken sitting in a catbird's seat watching every match. (Like one game show where the champion watched the challengers from a catbird's seat -- can't remember it -- think it was late 70's/early 80's).
[snapback]69347[/snapback]
[/quote]

I think you might be refering to the Narz "Now You See It".

-Joe R.
[snapback]69361[/snapback]
[/quote]

I do believe so, yes.  Thankoo.

starcade

  • Guest
"Ultimate Jeopardy"
« Reply #97 on: January 03, 2005, 10:03:09 PM »
[quote name=\'gameshowsteve\' date=\'Dec 31 2004, 06:26 PM\'][quote name=\'Matt Ottinger\' date=\'Dec 31 2004, 01:00 PM\']After Ken, Eddie is probably the most famous contestant Jeopardy has.  They'd be crazy not to include him in this.
[/quote]
I'm not sure if this was starcade's question (if not, it's mine): I believe Millionaire's contract prohibits contestants from appearing on another game show for a year after the date of the qualifying phone call, which would probably have been in September for Eddie. Would he have to return his $50K from Millionaire to appear?
[snapback]69374[/snapback]
[/quote]

I think it would have to be a known quantity there.  I think Eddie probably taped his appearance in, what, Aug. or Sept.?  I can't think all the T's and I's were crossed and dotted for this until just recently.  I do think there'd have to be some discussion between the shows to include him (which was my rationale for asking...).

clemon79

  • Member
  • Posts: 27693
  • Director of Suck Consolidation
"Ultimate Jeopardy"
« Reply #98 on: January 03, 2005, 10:19:38 PM »
[quote name=\'starcade\' date=\'Jan 3 2005, 07:54 PM\']The reason that a lot of people don't give Steve a lot of benefit is because they don't like the guy and are, bluntly, jealous of his success.  If they think they can do a better job, DO IT.
[/quote]
Okay, time for the mini-rant again.

The reason I don't give Steve a lot of "benefit" is because his authority and fame are wholly a result of his own manipulation of the media. We have members on this very group who are far more knowledgeable about the subject than The Perfesser is, and we certainly have members who are better journalists, which is SUPPOSED to be Steve-O's area of expertise.

The Perfesser, quite simply, is the World's Foremost Authority only because he says so, and the media believes him. Any one of us could pump out press releases and maintain a Web site offering our self-professed considerable knowledge when something major like this happens, but most of us would rather invest the not-insignificant time in something more useful, like a social life. And the media, who doesn't and doesn't care to know any better, sucks it all up like a Shamrock Shake. And it snowballs.

So I salute Steve Beverly for manipulating the media into thinking he's someone important, but at the same time I point out, as someone who has worked in a newsroom for several years, that it's about as difficult as one of the llama questions on Millionaire.
Chris Lemon, King Fool, Director of Suck Consolidation
http://fredsmythe.com
Email: clemon79@outlook.com  |  Skype: FredSmythe

Dbacksfan12

  • Member
  • Posts: 6222
  • Just leave the set; that’d be terrific.
"Ultimate Jeopardy"
« Reply #99 on: January 03, 2005, 10:24:57 PM »
[quote name=\'starcade\' date=\'Jan 3 2005, 09:54 PM\']The reason that a lot of people don't give Steve a lot of benefit is because they don't like the guy and are, bluntly, jealous of his success.  If they think they can do a better job, DO IT.
[/quote]
If I had the time to maintain such a site; I would.  However, I don't.  I'm in college; have a job; officiate basketball; and oh, yes--have a life outside of my computer.
That said; he follows highly questionable journalistic practices, many of which I don't agree with.
--Mark
Phil 4:13

BrandonFG

  • Member
  • Posts: 18599
"Ultimate Jeopardy"
« Reply #100 on: January 03, 2005, 11:59:14 PM »
[quote name=\'starcade\' date=\'Jan 3 2005, 09:54 PM\']Only because of the fact that he chose not to (with great (and somewhat deserved!) restraint and upset-ness...

The reason that a lot of people don't give Steve a lot of benefit is because they don't like the guy and are, bluntly, jealous of his success.  If they think they can do a better job, DO IT.
[snapback]69748[/snapback]
[/quote]

As a journalism major, I can tell you that although I don't dislike Steve, I definitely do not like some of his reporting ways. I've read far too many stories that have way too much subjectivity, which is a no-no in journalism. Sure, you could say it's not a bona fide journalistic site, compared to the NY Times (wait, bad example, but you get the point), but still a little objectivity wouldn't hurt, and could say a lot for credibility given Steve's background.
"It wasn't like this on Tic Tac Dough...Wink never gave a damn!"

SplitSecond

  • Guest
"Ultimate Jeopardy"
« Reply #101 on: January 04, 2005, 12:21:35 AM »
[quote name=\'fostergray82\' date=\'Jan 3 2005, 09:59 PM\']As a journalism major, I can tell you that although I don't dislike Steve, I definitely do not like some of his reporting ways. I've read far too many stories that have way too much subjectivity, which is a no-no in journalism. Sure, you could say it's not a bona fide journalistic site, compared to the NY Times (wait, bad example, but you get the point), but still a little objectivity wouldn't hurt, and could say a lot for credibility given Steve's background.
[snapback]69787[/snapback]
[/quote]
If there was a magic machine that turned self-absorption into objectivity, Steve would be the best journalist the world has ever seen.

I love how he so deftly includes himself in the pictures of the Game Show Legends photo gallery from the Game Show Congress.

itiparanoid13

  • Member
  • Posts: 811
"Ultimate Jeopardy"
« Reply #102 on: January 04, 2005, 06:59:49 AM »
Quote
The reason that a lot of people don't give Steve a lot of benefit is because they don't like the guy and are, bluntly, jealous of his success.  If they think they can do a better job, DO IT.

Hmm, last time I checked, some of us, most of the staff are here also, do try to do it better and, IMO, do better.  It's called Game Show NewsNet.

Don Howard

  • Member
  • Posts: 5729
"Ultimate Jeopardy"
« Reply #103 on: January 04, 2005, 09:50:53 AM »
Day One of Ultimate Jeopardy!
Alex introduces King Ken at the top of the show. Ken enters.
ALEX: Great to have you back, Ken.
KEN: Great to be here, Alex. This should be fun.

Day Two of Ultimate Jeopardy!
Alex introduces King Ken at the top of the show. Ken enters.
ALEX: What did you think of the show yesterday, Ken?
KEN: I thought it was exciting. Leszek looks dangerous. I'm afraid to play him in the final round.

Day Three of Ultimate Jeopardy!
Alex introduces King Ken at the top of the show. Ken enters.
ALEX: Good competition so far, wouldn't you, say, Ken?
KEN: Absolutely, Alex. Chuck still has the right stuff. I think he'll be a strong contender.

Day Four of Ultimate Jeopardy!
Alex introduces King Ken at the top of the show. Ken enters.
ALEX: Any advice to the players who have yet to play in our tournament?
KEN: I'd say follow Frank's example from yesterday. He's tough and I believe he has what it takes to go the distance.

And on and on and on and on.......................................

clemon79

  • Member
  • Posts: 27693
  • Director of Suck Consolidation
"Ultimate Jeopardy"
« Reply #104 on: January 04, 2005, 11:46:24 AM »
[quote name=\'Don Howard\' date=\'Jan 4 2005, 07:50 AM\']Alex introduces King Ken at the top of the show. Ken enters.
Alex introduces King Ken at the top of the show. Ken enters.
Alex introduces King Ken at the top of the show. Ken enters.
Alex introduces King Ken at the top of the show. Ken enters.
[/quote]

Dance, monkey! DANCE! :)
Chris Lemon, King Fool, Director of Suck Consolidation
http://fredsmythe.com
Email: clemon79@outlook.com  |  Skype: FredSmythe