[quote name=\'Ian Wallis\' date=\'Jan 13 2005, 07:03 AM\']That's something I never liked of the Osmond version. If you win both games in one show, you should get a shot at something extra. The '80s Clark version got it right - first game $10,000; win or lose, second game a total of $25,000.
[snapback]71122[/snapback]
[/quote]
I know this flies in the face of everything I have said about Mo Money Syndrome, but it wouldn't even kill me if on a syndicated Pyramid with no network limitations on winnings, if the first trip were worth $10K and the second trip in the same show were worth $25K regardless of whether the first trip were successful or not. Consider, to coin a baseball phrase: if you've won both games and the first WC, you're well on your way to the Pyramid equivalent of hitting for the cycle, right? So why not build it up, and give that contestant a shot at a big payday? You can even have a separate harder WC ready to lock and load for that exact scenario, if you like.
(And I'm assuming we're back to Clark production values here, not the everybody-wins-so-long-as-they-have-a-pulse Osmond WC, that had all of the soul sucked out of it.)
Now, that said: Do I NEED this to improve the show? Hell, no. I've said I'd watch a properly-done Pyramid if the WC were played for a case of Two-Buck Chuck, and I mean it. But it would certainly make that WC an edge-of-your-seat event (like they aren't anyhow, again, when done right!) when someone's about to run the table...