[quote name=\'CarShark\' date=\'May 5 2005, 04:26 PM\'][quote name=\'cmjb13\' date=\'May 4 2005, 11:53 PM\']From my 10/20/03 post:
"Super Saver was retired because of technical issues and there was an issue with Game practices where Bob apparently didn't explain the game correctly and decided it wasn't worth the hassle to play it any more."
[snapback]84436[/snapback]
[/quote]
I guess I'm not really satisfied by either reason. 1) Why would they retire a game just because the rules were expained wrong
one time? Wouldn't it be better just to make sure that he says it every time? 2) They've had mechanical problems with so many of the games, so why would Super Saver's make it not worth playing at all?
[snapback]84512[/snapback]
[/quote]
Sounds more like someone had issues with the game for a while and the rules not being said correctly as well as the mechanical problems put the nails in the $uper $aver coffin.
I'm sure if Pick-a-Pair can make a comeback due to issues, so can $uper $aver (the issue with the marry-go-round and Bob being able to see all the prices before they were revealed).
[quote name=\'jmangin\' date=\'May 5 2005, 08:23 AM\']For Dice Game, Bob always says there are no zeroes and no numbers above six. It's not fair to compare the Super Saver debacle against Dice Game since the same issue has not happened for both games.
[snapback]84467[/snapback]
[/quote]
Bad example or not, the Dice Game example with the 0's was one that never happened, but one that could easily happen.
Regarding about Pick-a-Pair, I loved the marry-go-round but I am very happy that the game set was revamped... the game took wayyyy too long waiting for the prizes to come up.