[quote name=\'Ian Wallis\' post=\'224583\' date=\'Aug 31 2009, 02:49 PM\']He thought every season should have one million-dollar winner.
Do you agree with this? Does it bother you that it's been so long or are you OK with it? Would you like to see at least one person win the big one each year (I don't know how you'd guarantee it, but would you like to see it)?[/quote]Nope, I sure don't. Australia went five years without a winner, and England at least two.
There was an episode from Millionaire's "Mega" series, and two contestants each won $250,000 back-to-back. When you have everyone and their dog winning $64,000 and more, it stops becoming special. The game was no longer about "will I reach $32,000?" but "how many lifelines can I bring into the top tier?" The same thing happened with Deal or No Deal: the structure of the game board made it so that everyone but the most unlucky of contestants could have stopped with $100,000 at some point. And Even before THAT, Wheel of Fortune is guilty. A bonus round doesn't feel the same when the host can say "Aw shucks, don't worry about not solving the bonus puzzle because you won more during the main game."
In one-third the number of episodes the primetime version had nineteen $500,000 winners, and fifty-seven people won $250,000.* Even if you take into account the fact that the primetime show was an hour, that's still a whole bunch of people winning heaps of money. It was special when Doug won the $250,000. It was incredible when Michael won $500,000. But after you have consecutive big winners, it ceases to become special.
* Yes, I looked it up, no I can't recall all their names. Source-age: wwtbam.biz.