Author Topic: The Worst Of The Bunch... (Read 34712 times)

gamed121683 · « **Reply #15 on:** October 01, 2009, 04:43:49 PM »

[quote name=\'ChrisLambert!\' post=\'227380\' date=\'Oct 1 2009, 04:25 PM\'][quote name=\'fostergray82\' post=\'227366\' date=\'Oct 1 2009, 02:49 PM\']-Dick Clark Productions-No Relation...dull as dishwater variation of TTTT that aired on FX (or fX at that time) in summer '96 or '97.[/quote]

It's amazing that Mike Rowe survived that abomination. It's my nominee for Worst Game Show Ever.
[/quote]

That's your nominee? My vote would've gone to The Chamber. To each their own, I guess.

gamed121683 · « **Reply #16 on:** October 01, 2009, 04:45:28 PM »

[quote name=\'Twentington\' post=\'227382\' date=\'Oct 1 2009, 04:28 PM\'][quote name=\'ChrisLambert!\' post=\'227380\' date=\'Oct 1 2009, 04:25 PM\'][quote name=\'fostergray82\' post=\'227366\' date=\'Oct 1 2009, 02:49 PM\']-Dick Clark Productions-No Relation...dull as dishwater variation of TTTT that aired on FX (or fX at that time) in summer '96 or '97.[/quote]

It's amazing that Mike Rowe survived that abomination. It's my nominee for Worst Game Show Ever.
[/quote]

Does that title remind anyone else of Buster and Babs Bunny?

Seriously, what was the premise of this show? Google's surprisingly silent.
[/quote]

Maybe you didn't look hard enough... :-/

BrandonFG · « **Reply #17 on:** October 01, 2009, 04:46:45 PM »

[quote name=\'Twentington\' post=\'227382\' date=\'Oct 1 2009, 04:28 PM\']Seriously, what was the premise of this show? Google's surprisingly silent.[/quote]
From what I can remember, a "family" of five appeared on set, while one was the imposter. A panel of celebrities (3?) asked questions, TTTT-style, to determine to odd (wo)man out.

Forgot all about The Chamber.

/For good reason prolly

Kevin Prather · « **Reply #18 on:** October 01, 2009, 04:50:34 PM »

Michael Davies - Chain Reaction.

alfonzos · « **Reply #19 on:** October 01, 2009, 05:36:45 PM »

The Better Sex was saved by a great Bonus Round.

Jumpondees · « **Reply #20 on:** October 01, 2009, 06:05:10 PM »

[quote name=\'Twentington\' post=\'227382\' date=\'Oct 1 2009, 04:28 PM\']Does that title remind anyone else of Buster and Babs Bunny?[/quote]

<Sarcasm>Makes me want to run right out and pick up Tiny Toon Adventures on DVD </Sarcasm>

Winkfan · « **Reply #21 on:** October 01, 2009, 06:41:19 PM »

B&E: All About The Opposite Sex; Surprised some of you have forgetten.....
Barris: Three's A Crowd, ORIGINAL version; Now if that version had more variety like the later GSN version did (i.e: husbands vs. fathers-in-law, boyfriends vs. brothers), it would've lasted a couple more years. Instead, it turned into a "one-joke" show; but in this case, the joke bombed -- big-time.
Stone-Stanley: All except Shop Til You Drop; (the Pat Finn years, that is)

Cordially,
Tammy

Kevin Prather · « **Reply #22 on:** October 01, 2009, 06:51:08 PM »

[quote name=\'Winkfan\' post=\'227409\' date=\'Oct 1 2009, 03:41 PM\']Stone-Stanley: All except Shop Til You Drop; (the Pat Finn years, that is)[/quote]
Respectfully disagree. Legends was just fine.

Dbacksfan12 · « **Reply #23 on:** October 01, 2009, 06:56:10 PM »

[quote name=\'Winkfan\' post=\'227409\' date=\'Oct 1 2009, 05:41 PM\']Barris: Three's A Crowd, ORIGINAL version; Now if that version had more variety like the later GSN version did (i.e: husbands vs. fathers-in-law, boyfriends vs. brothers), it would've lasted a couple more years. Instead, it turned into a "one-joke" show; but in this case, the joke bombed; big-time.[/quote]Yeah, because it worked so well 20 years later.

Twentington · « **Reply #24 on:** October 01, 2009, 07:07:51 PM »

[quote name=\'Kevin Prather\' post=\'227410\' date=\'Oct 1 2009, 06:51 PM\'][quote name=\'Winkfan\' post=\'227409\' date=\'Oct 1 2009, 03:41 PM\']Stone-Stanley: All except Shop Til You Drop; (the Pat Finn years, that is)[/quote]
Respectfully disagree. Legends was just fine.
[/quote]

...Except for Kirk-bot, who managed to crash when reading a cue card.

tpirfan28 · « **Reply #25 on:** October 01, 2009, 07:33:52 PM »

[quote name=\'Kevin Prather\' post=\'227410\' date=\'Oct 1 2009, 06:51 PM\'][quote name=\'Winkfan\' post=\'227409\' date=\'Oct 1 2009, 03:41 PM\']Stone-Stanley: All except Shop Til You Drop; (the Pat Finn years, that is)[/quote]
Respectfully disagree. Legends was just fine.
[/quote]
I also disagree - Winning Lines and The Mole (in addition to Legends)

/Fremantle: CS '01 is right there with Temptation.

ChrisLambert! · « **Reply #26 on:** October 01, 2009, 07:45:37 PM »

[quote name=\'gamed121683\' post=\'227385\' date=\'Oct 1 2009, 04:43 PM\']That's your nominee? My vote would've gone to The Chamber. To each their own, I guess.[/quote]

While Chamber was bad, it was never boring.

Mr. Armadillo · « **Reply #27 on:** October 01, 2009, 07:47:09 PM »

[quote name=\'gamed121683\' post=\'227385\' date=\'Oct 1 2009, 03:43 PM\'][quote name=\'ChrisLambert!\' post=\'227380\' date=\'Oct 1 2009, 04:25 PM\'][quote name=\'fostergray82\' post=\'227366\' date=\'Oct 1 2009, 02:49 PM\']-Dick Clark Productions-No Relation...dull as dishwater variation of TTTT that aired on FX (or fX at that time) in summer '96 or '97.[/quote]

It's amazing that Mike Rowe survived that abomination. It's my nominee for Worst Game Show Ever.
[/quote]

That's your nominee? My vote would've gone to The Chamber. To each their own, I guess.
[/quote]
I dunno. Chamber might have been a trainwreck, but at least it was visually interesting, and laughing at the poor schmucks who actually signed up for this gives it at least some redeeming value.

Bottom 10%? Sure. Worst ever? Nah. I think a show has to completely put you to sleep to win that title.

NickintheATL · « **Reply #28 on:** October 01, 2009, 09:23:04 PM »

[quote name=\'Matt Ottinger\' post=\'227373\' date=\'Oct 1 2009, 03:37 PM\'][quote name=\'NicholasM79\' post=\'227359\' date=\'Oct 1 2009, 02:06 PM\']Goodson/Todman: What's Going On?[/quote]
You'll find a lot of support for Mindreaders.
[/quote]

Oh yeah, that one was just as bad.

Something else I just remembered What's Going On?: remember the story related in "The Box" when Lee Bowman misinterpreted the stretch cue as a wrap cue.

/Is it possible to have ties?

TLEberle · « **Reply #29 on:** October 01, 2009, 11:04:34 PM »

[quote name=\'fostergray82\' post=\'227387\' date=\'Oct 1 2009, 01:46 PM\']Forgot all about The Chamber.[/quote]As much as I'm willing to say "The players went in willingly, and Survivor has harsh environments that you stay in for longer and so on, but The Chamber was just a boring game that was made worse by a dreadful physical element.

[quote name=\'Kevin Prather\' post=\'227388\' date=\'Oct 1 2009, 01:50 PM\']Michael Davies - Chain Reaction.[/quote]

[quote name=\'Winkfan\' post=\'227409\' date=\'Oct 1 2009, 03:41 PM\']B&E: All About The Opposite Sex; Surprised some of you have forgetten.....[/quote] Really?

Quote

Barris: Three's A Crowd, ORIGINAL version; Now if that version had more variety like the later GSN version did (i.e: husbands vs. fathers-in-law, boyfriends vs. brothers), it would've lasted a couple more years. Instead, it turned into a "one-joke" show; but in this case, the joke bombed; big-time.

The revival wasn't all that great, but at least it seemed to have a more light-hearted approach to the whole exercise.

Quote

Stone-Stanley: All except Shop Til You Drop; (the Pat Finn years, that is)

Wrong, you fail. Doubly so, because you sweep all the others under the rug, and save what was really a lame uninteresting time-filelr.

So here's a noggin tickler: M. G. 's Crosswords or Monopoly?