[quote name=\'JMFabiano\' post=\'228348\' date=\'Oct 12 2009, 12:10 PM\'][quote name=\'tpirfan28\' post=\'228195\' date=\'Oct 10 2009, 03:10 PM\']Normally, most of the comments on my YouTube videos equates to garbage, but this one recently caught my eye:
At least Bullard wasn't that bad of a host. Richard Karn was a far bigger catastrophe.
Found it really interesting. So I pose the question - which hosts would we classify as "bad"?
[/quote]
OT, but I think revisionist fanboi history hasn't been kind to Karn. He wasn't GREAT (certainly better than Louie, but not a tall order), but I don't recall him getting annoying until the DTP! routine started. And isn't it half the fault of the producers for encouraging the applause at said statement?
The Karn era is underappreciated, IMO...just for the reason that they started fitting in more of classic Feud that would culminate in the O'Hurley renaissance (Single/Single/DOUBLE THE POINTS/TRIPLE ETC. ETC., 300 to win, returning champions, even the set was for a while a cross between the classic colors and the pre-O'Hurley style)
/And FYI, "DOUBLE THE POINTS!!!!!" > "I'm a nice guy!"
//As in, overstating the rules > "No, because those are the rules of the game!"
[/quote]
I know I prefer the old days, but here's what I think Karn needed superficially: A shave, a haircut, a good wardrobe and to lose a few pounds. The role on "Home Improvement" required a certain scruffiness, not "Family Feud."