Set for Life was the first show that came to mind when I first saw this topic title a couple weeks ago. (The Chamber was the second, probably because in the back of my mind I was unsure if it was over 10 years ago or not and a quick Google check confirmed it is.) I generally like game shows enough that I\'ll give anything at least a few episodes, but between not showing or explaining the first half of the game, showing the second half of the game twice, the whole game being nothing but picking up glowsticks, the stupid guardian angel mechanic, Jimmy Kimmel barely being able to stay awake... the whole thing was so bad I didn\'t even bother to tune in after the first episode.
One thing I\'ve noticed a number of times over the years is that I tend to be far too lenient in judging hosts, especially mediocre ones like Ty and Dylan. I do prefer hosts who do the job well, because good hosts can make a bad show decent or a good show great (heck, even the lousiest formats the 70s could come up with were watchable thanks to Bill Cullen), but unless a host is obnoxious or out of it to the point that he\'s actively making the show worse, I usually don\'t think they\'re doing the job as poorly as they actually are.
