Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Match Game 2016 Finale - Monday 9/19 - 10:01 pm  (Read 9317 times)

nowhammies10

  • Member
  • Posts: 451
Re: Match Game 2016 Finale - Monday 9/19 - 10:01 pm
« Reply #15 on: September 20, 2016, 10:57:18 AM »
Fun fact: Jack originally showed his answer and the judges buzzed it as not a match.

Fair enough.

If the judges are looking for the "essence" of the answer, then that's fine.  But even so, not all nipples are part of boobs. I think that's where I would agree with their initial judgment.

Neumms

  • Member
  • Posts: 2449
Re: Match Game 2016 Finale - Monday 9/19 - 10:01 pm
« Reply #16 on: September 20, 2016, 11:33:31 AM »
But even so, not all nipples are part of boobs.

Paging Marky Mark. In the context of the question, if it happened to the former, it would look a lot different than if it were the whole boob.

Did anyone else hear Alec under the music on the way to a commercial tell the contestants to give the dirtiest answer they could think of?

Jay Temple

  • Member
  • Posts: 2227
Re: Match Game 2016 Finale - Monday 9/19 - 10:01 pm
« Reply #17 on: September 20, 2016, 04:48:37 PM »
On the referee question, I'm disappointed nobody had

ILLEGAL MOTION IN THE BACKFIELD

--Charlie
I thought of EXCESSIVE CELEBRATION.
Protecting idiots from themselves just leads to more idiots.

TLEberle

  • Member
  • Posts: 15904
  • Rules Constable
Re: Match Game 2016 Finale - Monday 9/19 - 10:01 pm
« Reply #18 on: September 20, 2016, 04:49:06 PM »
Jay matches with me.
If you didn’t create it, it isn’t your content.

MSTieScott

  • Executive Producer
  • Posts: 1917
Re: Match Game 2016 Finale - Monday 9/19 - 10:01 pm
« Reply #19 on: September 20, 2016, 05:17:17 PM »
I had illegal use of hands, though during the commercial break, I came up with too many men on the field, which made me laugh.

For the Sarah Palin question, the writers were hoping somebody would answer beaver, right?

nowhammies10

  • Member
  • Posts: 451
Re: Match Game 2016 Finale - Monday 9/19 - 10:01 pm
« Reply #20 on: September 20, 2016, 08:28:56 PM »
I had illegal use of hands

So did I, but thought that holding or offside would be a better "general answer"

Quote
For the Sarah Palin question, the writers were hoping somebody would answer beaver, right?

That's what I thought too.  That's the definitive answer.

/Thought of a good one as I'm typing: illegal block in the back

jjman920

  • Member
  • Posts: 1252
  • Mhoops.
Re: Match Game 2016 Finale - Monday 9/19 - 10:01 pm
« Reply #21 on: September 20, 2016, 08:42:13 PM »
I had illegal use of hands, though during the commercial break, I came up with too many men on the field, which made me laugh.
I had come up with "roughing the passer". Those kinds of questions are fun, but there are so many things that fit.

For the Sarah Palin question, the writers were hoping somebody would answer beaver, right?
I was about to bring that up. I simply can't believe that not a single person said that. Also, during the Hillary question, I think it was pretty clear that "E-Mails" was the definitive answer. This show was lacking good panelists and good contestants.
Me: Of all of the game shows you've hosted besides Jeopardy!, like High Rollers or Classic Concentration, which is your favorite?
Alex Trebek: I'd have to say To Tell The Truth, because it was the first time in my career that I got to sit down while I was hosting.

JayDLewis

  • Member
  • Posts: 560
Re: Match Game 2016 Finale - Monday 9/19 - 10:01 pm
« Reply #22 on: September 22, 2016, 10:22:24 AM »
On the referee question, I'm disappointed nobody had

ILLEGAL MOTION IN THE BACKFIELD


I guessed something along the lines of FUMBLING HIS BALL(S). And, yes, they must've wanted her BEAVER buffed.
QWIZX.com  -- A little bit of everything

Jay Temple

  • Member
  • Posts: 2227
Re: Match Game 2016 Finale - Monday 9/19 - 10:01 pm
« Reply #23 on: September 22, 2016, 11:58:15 AM »
I had illegal use of hands, though during the commercial break, I came up with too many men on the field, which made me laugh.
Your second answer is one I also considered, and indeed thought funnier, but it would be perfectly reasonable of him to complain if it happened!

Quote
For the Sarah Palin question, the writers were hoping somebody would answer beaver, right?
I thought the same thing. I recall hearing that the 70's panelists were told NOT to say some things that were beyond risqué. I'm wondering if this was a similar situation. After all, we did see some answers digitized out.
Protecting idiots from themselves just leads to more idiots.