Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: J! Clue values-time for a bump again?  (Read 7577 times)

chrisholland03

  • Member
  • Posts: 1525
Re: J! Clue values-time for a bump again?
« Reply #15 on: February 05, 2017, 07:59:57 PM »
There's also the bragging rights of being on Jeopardy!  I'd be interested in knowing what the applicant to contestant ratio is.

clemon79

  • Member
  • Posts: 27644
  • Director of Suck Consolidation
Re: J! Clue values-time for a bump again?
« Reply #16 on: February 05, 2017, 10:21:19 PM »
Using the CPI Inflation Calculator (https://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/cpicalc.pl), here are the values of $100 through all of the key Jeopardy! dates:

1964 - $100.00
.
.
.
2016 - $774.22

So everything on the board today is 20 times what it was in 1964, yet the dollar itself is only worth a little less than eight times as much.

Tells me everything I need to know, I think.
Chris Lemon, King Fool, Director of Suck Consolidation
http://fredsmythe.com
Email: clemon79@outlook.com  |  Skype: FredSmythe

parliboy

  • Member
  • Posts: 1745
  • Which of my enemies told you I was paranoid?
Re: J! Clue values-time for a bump again?
« Reply #17 on: February 05, 2017, 10:41:17 PM »
So everything on the board today is 20 times what it was in 1964, yet the dollar itself is only worth a little less than eight times as much.

Tells me everything I need to know, I think.

I think "only the winner keeps his cash" dilutes that a bit, but your position is otherwise well-taken.
"You're never ready, just less unprepared."

Sodboy13

  • Member
  • Posts: 1547
Re: J! Clue values-time for a bump again?
« Reply #18 on: February 05, 2017, 10:54:37 PM »
And if you want to weigh it against its contemporaries in terms of time period and ratings, I'd imagine Jeopardy pays out a lot more per week on average than Family Feud.
"Speed: it made Sandra Bullock a household name, and costs me over ten thousand a week."

--Shawn Micallef, Talkin' 'bout Your Generation

TLEberle

  • Member
  • Posts: 15801
  • Rules Constable
Re: J! Clue values-time for a bump again?
« Reply #19 on: February 05, 2017, 11:43:47 PM »
I think "only the winner keeps his cash" dilutes that a bit, but your position is otherwise well-taken.
So the clues would increase ten-fold, and the dollar is worth eight times as much.
Travis L. Eberle

parliboy

  • Member
  • Posts: 1745
  • Which of my enemies told you I was paranoid?
Re: J! Clue values-time for a bump again?
« Reply #20 on: February 05, 2017, 11:52:54 PM »
Thus "a bit".
"You're never ready, just less unprepared."

clemon79

  • Member
  • Posts: 27644
  • Director of Suck Consolidation
Re: J! Clue values-time for a bump again?
« Reply #21 on: February 06, 2017, 01:08:21 AM »
I think "only the winner keeps his cash" dilutes that a bit, but your position is otherwise well-taken.

Fair cop; that didn't occur to me. But yeah, I'd still argue that the current values are in line with the current value of a buck.
Chris Lemon, King Fool, Director of Suck Consolidation
http://fredsmythe.com
Email: clemon79@outlook.com  |  Skype: FredSmythe

Kevin Prather

  • Member
  • Posts: 6729
Re: J! Clue values-time for a bump again?
« Reply #22 on: February 06, 2017, 03:47:42 PM »
And don't forget the tournaments have gone up in prize money too. Tournaments that used to offer $25k to first place now offer that much to third place.

Neumms

  • Member
  • Posts: 2436
Re: J! Clue values-time for a bump again?
« Reply #23 on: February 09, 2017, 02:36:55 PM »
Personally, what I'd rather see is a return to the former style of play that didn't emphasize getting every clue revealed in a half hour, where there could be upwards of five or more clues untouched by the end of a round.

I, too, liked it when they didn't get through a board, though leaving five untouched is high. It put more of a premium on getting to choose.

jage

  • Member
  • Posts: 309
Re: J! Clue values-time for a bump again?
« Reply #24 on: February 09, 2017, 05:49:11 PM »
For me it's the reverse, especially when there is a category I wanted to see or was doing well at.